Must & Must Not(s) in Expert Evaluation

Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian


Usually, in any oral history project, interviewing is evaluated before the final text is formulated. At this stage, managers or project experts have seen the interview and evaluated it.

The following are methods of interview expert evaluation:

  1. In addition to scientific nobility on the subject, the expert must have a good understanding of the oral history interview and its characteristics. Otherwise, why some of the questions and techniques used in the interview will not be known and will result in faulty evaluation. The expert should appreciate that the text is not final, and until the release, it will encounter information and reformation. Unfortunately, there are cases in which the expert, due to lack of knowledge and competence in oral history methodology, conducts a faulty evaluation and exposes the project to complications.
  2. One of the tasks of the expert is to determine the degree of loyalty of the text to the main subject and to have a logical cognition of the relevance of the sub-topics to the main subject. There are many experts who focus on the main subject, and consider the sub-topics to be irrelevant. For example, if the narrator, in expressing political memoirs, refers to the cultural and social background of his city, the experts consider such discussion to be irrelevant to the subject matter. While any political activity is formed in a cultural and social context and is not strange to the process of struggle.
  3. Sometimes, during an interviews, questions and answers are repeated, and some experts view it as a weakness, while the interviewer's goal is to achieve a more complete answer by repetitions.
  4. Each narrative is associated with some analyzes, which in a way demonstrates the narrator's view and attitude to various historical phenomena. The insistence of experts on recording memories without any analysis is not always possible.
  5. Exaggerations and contradictions in the memoirs are common and do not necessarily reflect untruthfulness of the narration. The expert must acknowledge it and do not consider it a catastrophe. These matters can be corrected through research and dialogue with the narrator and the constructive interaction with them.
  6. The essence of oral history is in the plurality and diversity of narratives and differences, and sometimes in contradictions. The experts shall not worry and expect the production of a narrative consistent with the previous narratives or in accordance with the written literature.
  7. In text evaluation, the experts must put their personal tastes and political and party and even organizational affiliations aside and focus on the historical truth and narration accuracy. Unfortunately, in many cases, there are experts who try to impose their personal, political, and sometimes organizational point of views on the interview and hinder the freedom of the interviewer. In the long term, in spite of all costs and efforts, such impositions will affect the credibility of the materials produced and lead the researchers to other sources.


Number of Visits: 556


Full Name:
It Was Raised in an Interview with Ibrahim Afshar

Details of Oral History Project of Iranian Sport Press

Iranian Oral History Website: specialized sports newspapers and sports pages of news agencies are one of the most popular media, especially when it comes to football! Working in a newspaper or as a correspondent because of never-ending dynamism and excitement is filled with ups and downs and precious experiences for future reporters and an excuse to commemorate predecessors. In this regard, library, documentation center and oral history of the National Olympic Academy, ...

A belief though for the world

In the Name of God the Compassionate, the Merciful. I would like to welcome you all and acknowledge the good words I heard today. I met many dear friends. I would like to congratulate the narrators, as my sisters; the authors, as my sisters; the Art Division and Soureh Mehr Publication. They did a wonderful job. They spared no effort. This event was arranged with the efforts of Ms.
Typology of Oral History (1)

Basic Narrative & Pathology

Oral history seems to be easy to ignore. Particularly in extraction; in the field of compilation, we encounter texts that suffer many forms of problems. On the one hand, it is seen that the basis is a mere interview and extraction and editing that is lacking in priorities. Therefore, in spite of the efforts of the producer, the end result does not attract readers and specialists. The other part relates to oral ...

Verification in Documentation

Overview on the critical role of memoir typology in the trifecta theory of the book
What is verification/authentication? In discussing the matter, I intentionally, avoid the comparative realm of truth and reality; and I do not want this article to be tangled in the relativity of realism, which will be of no use. Hence, in defining verification/authentication, I shall apply the terminology of the concept and look at the issue from the audience point of view. The basic assumption in this concept is that the incident described in ...