Memoirs of Marzieh Hadidchi (Dabbagh) (Part 57)


Memoirs of Marzieh Hadidchi (Dabbagh) (Part 57)

Edited by: Mohsen Kazemi

Tehran, Sooreh Mehr Publications Company

‎2002 (Persian Version)‎

Translated by: Zahra Hosseinian


Performing prayer at the Moscow airport

After getting into car, we moved toward airport without killing time. It was noon when we arrived at the airport, so we decided to perform pray right there.

There was plenty of coming and goings in the pavilion, therefore, I spread a newspaper under my foot in a corner to perform my prayer. Finishing my prayer, I saw people stopped and looked at me in surprise. They looked questioningly at what I was doing. They marveled more when saw that the men of our delegation did the same in another corner. It seems that they had not seen such a thing yet.

A number of state authorities had come to see us off. We boarded the plane after saying goodbye. On the plane, I felt comfort. It seemed the rest had the same feeling. We were pleased with the mission we had accomplished, and I was still thinking of confronting Gorbachev and also shaking his hand. Many staffs of the embassy of our country complained that why they had not foreseen such a matter and had not informed us. After this trip, Mr. Javadi Amoli told me, ‘at the moment when Gorbachev stretched his hand to shake you, we were afraid that you lost your nerve, but thank God, you did very well.’

In the airplane of our country, we felt comfortable and lunched relaxed, and then, at the rest of the way, we were busy putting down some points about our travel and visit.



As soon as arriving Iran, we first visited Imam to report what we had seen and heard. Imam himself also had asked the members of delegation come to see him.

Visiting Imam, Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, the head of delegation, reported what he had said, seen, and heard. "Who saw his face?" Imam asked. He meant that which of us observed Gorbachev's reactions. I answered, ‘I kept looking at him, he reacted and his faced changed in two parts of the letter and he was silent and thoughtful in the remaining; first, where you had asked them to send their experts to Qom, and the other one, where you had said that we are involved in the destiny of Muslims around the world; and he brought both of them into question.’ Imam pointed out that Mr. Javadi Amoli responded well to the questions. Imam Khomeini was satisfied so far and smiled.

In less than two months, Gorbachev fulfilled his promise and sent a letter for Imam by his Foreign Minister, Eduard Shevardnadze. When Shevardnadze came to Tehran and Jamaran, I was not in Tehran, but Mr. Javadi Amoli and Larijani were present at the meeting. Apparently, Eduard Shevardnadze was influenced by simple life of Imam Khomeini[1].


Reasons for selecting

Writing and communicating a message for one of two poles of world which was on the verge of great political and ideological changes, was a great and historic task for Imam, and the passage of time proved the correctness of Imam’s predictions; when he warned about false promises of the west world and said that he could hear the sound of breaking the bones of communism, and from now on, it could be looked for in the museums of political history of the world.

Now, why Mr. Javadi Amoli and Larijani and I were selected to communicate such an important and historic message, was in question. In particular, it was in question why I, as a woman, was one of representatives of Imam, and had the honor of going to such a great travel, in which there was any kind of danger; and as Mr. Ahmad Khomeini asked us to write or renew our will, it was feared that we did not return to the country again.

Coming back home, I asked Ahmad Khomeini about the will. ‘We felt that we are at risk.’ he answered very clearly, ‘It was possible that the Americans aimed the plane in the sky or even the government of Soviet Union arrested you and not let you go back again, and so many other possibilities.’

Imam Khomeini’s action was reminder of the Prophet in the early years of Islam, when he sent his messengers and harbingers to all parts of the world without any fear, because he wanted the divine message and the call of justice and freedom to be sent to the hearts of all the world, especially the Roman Empire and Iran. It was a movement which had a great blessing for Islam and Muslims, and now it was repeated by deputy of Prophet's child.

In my opinion, Mr. Javadi Amoli was outstanding in terms of religious science and Islamic knowledge, especially in cognition of the Qur'an and Quranic science, as well as philosophy and mysticism, and he enjoyed a special status among religious scholars. In addition, he did not enclosed himself only in seminary and was sensitive to the governmental issues and had a deep interest in executing the commands of God and in implementing the laws of Islam. He could easily comment about all philosophical problems of the world, from west to the east, and defended Islam.

His voice, calmness, and firm behaviors impressed each of audience; and Imam was aware of all the characteristics of Mr. Javadi Amoli more than anyone else, and such a good choice could be for these reasons.

Mr. Larijani was also a well-educated man with a Ph.D. degree in philosophy and mathematics, who came from a religious family. In today politics, he was an expert, learned and thoughtful figure with astute views, and he also was reliable. In my opinion, the other reasons for selecting him could be being Deputy of Foreign Minister and having perfect command of a number of foreign languages.

And about selecting me, as far as I was concerned, I did not find any reason except that Imam intended to send a woman along with men to the Soviet Union and declared that Iranian women also participate in the important and governmental affairs and they are pioneer. And also he wanted to send an oral message, beside a written one, that we practically value (semantic but not instrumental value) the true position of the woman more than any other school. By sending a woman along with his representatives, Imam wanted to end all the propaganda of the West and the East based on the constraint of the woman in the Islamic society; while in the West the media regularly wrote in detail about constraint of women in the Islamic republic of Iran.

Imam intents to send a letter to Gorbachev, and the presence of a woman does not need at all. But he sends a woman along with delegation to Moscow. What exactly is necessary to send a woman? What would happen if Mr. Javadi Amoli delivered Imam Khomeini’s letter alone to Mr. Gorbachev and then returned? I am sure no problem has arisen, but why Imam Khomeini select a woman to accompany the delegation for communicating the letter! He wants to say that the presence of women is necessary anywhere. Women should enter the arena [...] I think that in addition to declaring the presence and appearance of women in different roles, Imam Khomeini also wants to solve an international issue here: the presence of women in international issues is must, and I, as your leader, select and send from both female stratum and male stratum for the first or last time I want to send a message to the international community[2].

Perhaps many years of my participation in the field of fighting, separation, and being away from my home, as well as several months of working in Neauphle-le-Château as a servant of Imam, and even my responsibilities after victory of the Islamic Revolution (such as commanding Hamadan IRGC, being representative of Islamic Consultative Assembly several times, being in charge of women’s Basij, and ...) were not ineffective in this selection.

Imam Khomeini wanted from his heart that his representatives appear firm and strong at the heart of East Empire and the great house of communism, and they are able to make a decisive decision in necessary and critical times and do well.

I recall that in a part of his speech in Mashhad about the power of Islam, Mr. Javadi Amoli had said, after referring to the mission of delegation in Moscow: "this was our women’s appearance in front of a superpower: they, at first, push back his hand courageously and then bring him to his knees, so that he says we stretch our unarmed hands toward your men.


To be continued…


[1]. To find out Mr. Gorbachev's answer to Imam Khomeini, see Apendix No. 4.

[2]Keyhan newspaper, No. 17023 (February 13, 2001), interview with Mrs. Dabbagh.

Number of Visits: 53


Full Name:

Historians are the First Reporters

"Mazar-i-Sharifis fallen. 17th Moradad 1377 (8th August, 1998), here is the place of the Iranian Consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif, and I am Mahmoud Saremi, the reporter of Islamic Republic of Iran, Taliban group have entered into Mazar-i-Sharif few hours ago. Instant, instant news! Mazar-i-Sharif was fallen by Taliban ...
Introduction to “How many of us were there?”

Iranian Kazakhs in the Holy Defense

The book “How many of us were there?” focuses on the memoirs of the Islamic Revolution and the war imposed by Iraq with the subject of “a glance on the presence of Kazakhs in the Holy Defense”. Hojjat Shahmohammadi, the author, in a seven page introduction defines the reasons ...

Publication of Oral History Theory in Persian

“Oral History Theory” by Lynn Abrams, translated by Fathali Ashtiani was published by the Office of Islamic Revolution Literature and Soureh Mehr Publication in 2018. The book is structured in 421 pages and eight chapters: the introduction transforms the applicable approach to theoretic, the characteristics of oral history, self, subjectivity, intersubjectivity, memory, narrative, performance and power. Couple of forewords and introductions precede the eight chapters and then followed by the references used to compile the eight chapters of the book.

Oral History Is a Kind of Document

One of the questions that have always preoccupied historians of oral history is that: Is there any need to written documents and so on in recording oral history and compiling its text? An overview of types of documents and nature of oral history can answer this question. Most historical evidence emanates from remains of paper, skin, stone, etc. from preceding eras. But verbal evidence emerges in response to ...