History Scholar
Oral History of Economic Features Is Neglected
Shima Donyadar Rostami
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian
2019-1-22
"Recently, oral history is used as a tool for contemporary history, and it can be cited in this field. Oral history is recognized as one of the pillars of the history of the people, a history that is mentioned and discussed with the approach of "Downstream history" (writing history from the lower levels of the society)”, said Hooria Saeedi, a scholar of history to the correspondent of the Iranian oral history site.
"In our society, where the oral history debate is a concept in its infancy, its startup process is of crucial importance and “interview” is the starting point of recording oral history. The type of communication that interviewers and interviewees establish (the interaction) is very important”, she said by stating that the oral history gaps in every society correspond to the issues prevailing and differ.
The author of "Memories and Hazards: Oral History Interview with Dr. Seyed Kumal Kharrazi" emphasized: "The approach to oral history recording cannot be directorial. No organization can genuinely take measures to record actual oral history through directorial approach. First a two-way, human relationship must be created between the interviewer and the interviewee, and then there are other issues such as questions, how to respond to each question, reactions to responses, rise of new questions after each response are to be addressed; it is the curious mind of the interviewer that should be engaged in the subject of the interview. "
"Explaining the characteristics of the oral history interviewer," she said: "Of course, not everybody can be an interviewer. The interviewer must be the one who is both well versed on the subject and have preliminary studies. Meanwhile, they should have strong social skills. These are the prerequisites of recording of oral history. Part of this introduction is acquired through training and some is acquisitive. The next step is transcription of the interview and then compilation which vary under different circumstances."
According to Saeedi, each type of compilation and production serves its value however the most important point is to preserve the most important information and data gained during the interview. In compilation and production, irrelevant information shall not dominate the bulk of it. In fact, footnotes in the oral history works shall not overcome the main content or affect it.
Author of “Shah va Jenab Agha” stated that as a result of training workshops held on the topic of oral history some gaps have been filled and continued: “The trainers in oral history workshops should be carefully selected from those who have worked in the field for long years. Generally, those who have been involved in compiling information in the field of oral history after the imposed war are more experienced and it is useful to present the type of oral history existing in Iran based on their work.”
According to this scholar of history, considering that political issues usually supersede other issues, the activities in the field of oral history of political features has been extensive; while the oral history of economic features has been neglected. Attending the political features has its own advantages but it does not cover the whole oral history.
Number of Visits: 5099
The latest
- Javad Poyanfar's Memories
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -1
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
- Rahim Afshar's Memories
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
Most visited
- 100 Questions/ 33
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Rahim Afshar's Memories
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.100 Questions/27
What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
