Impact of Emotional Status
Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghveridian
2018-2-6
Purposeful conversations about past events and their excavation from the narrator's mind is effective in mitigating psychological stress accumulated over time to create more favorable emotional status. Even in some cases it is felt that the narrator is trying to settle accounts with a specific person by recounting some issues to set free from a mental and conscientious pressure and achieve some sort of peace.
This is one of the strengths of recounting memories. This is precisely why some psychoanalysts are talking to their clients and asking them to express the bitter and sweet memories associated with the various subjects that have persisted for many years.
There are many who experience influx of memories, burst into crying or different emotions during an oral history interview. For, during the interview, they go deep into their mind and revisit sad and happy events, their failures and triumphs, their fears which they have experience during the years, but have never talked about them before, and it is now the first time they have expressed them.
"I say this for the first time and I do not know why I told them to you. In the past, many asked me to tell my memories, but I never went for it. “is a very common statement often heard from the narrators. In fact, the narrator recounts memories because of the trust which has been mutually build ensuring that the narration won’t be subject to abuse and manipulation. Perhaps this is the reason why some narrators are attached to the interviewer and willing to continue their friendship.
In such a situation, a few questions are raised:
Are all interviewees ready to open their mind? Do they all have the same psychological state? Is the person who accepted the interview ready to recount all their memories?
The answer to all these questions is negative and one judgment doesn’t apply to all. An oral history interviewer should pay attention to the fact that people and their condition varies which reflect their intellectual and cultural differences, and each narrator has their unique mental and psychological conditions. Hence, not all are to be expected to open their mind or share the same emotions concerning similar topics.
Sometimes it's even seen that people resist the questions and try to conceal their information and observations. This behavioral pattern may be influenced by some psychological and emotional pressure if it is not due to political and security restrictions or religious or moral considerations, which keeps the narrator from expressing some of his/her memories. In such circumstances, the interviewer shall approach with caution.
However, the narrator has lived for many years with his memories and secrets, and they have become a part of his/her identity, and now we should not expect them to be express all based on some simple justifications.
An oral history interviewer should be mindful of the mental condition of the narrator and try to slowly and gradually extract the memories. However, rushing the narrator will not only compromise the desired result, but might also expose the narrator with some psychological and neurological complications.
Number of Visits: 5358
The latest
- Analyzing the Impact of Sacred Defense Memories on the New Generation: Usage in Transmitting Values
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- 100 Questions/15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 15
Most visited
- The Artillery of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
- Translation in Oral History and Its Potential Pitfalls
- A Critical Look at Pioneers of the Valley of Light
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- 100 Questions/15
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
Omissions in the Editing of Oral History
After the completion of interview sessions, the original recordings are archived, the interviews are transcribed, proofread, and re-listened to. If the material possesses the qualities required for publication in the form of an article or a book, the editing process must begin. In general, understanding a verbatim transcription of an interview is often not straightforward and requires editing so that it may be transformed into a fluent, well-documented text that is easy to comprehend.100 Questions/8
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.The Role of Objects in Oral Narrative
Philosophers refer to anything that exists—or possesses the potential to exist—as an object. This concept may manifest in material forms, abstract notions, and even human emotions and lived experiences. In other words, an object encompasses a vast spectrum of beings and phenomena, each endowed with particular attributes and characteristics, and apprehensible in diverse modalities.100 Questions/6
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.