Which priority?
Receipt of memories or truth discovery
Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian
2018-1-16
Targeted interview within the framework of a specific subject is one of the prominent features of oral history. Accordingly, the oral history scholars are requested to maintain respect towards the narrator, open their mind and patiently listen to the narrator and ask questions in due time within the limits defined.
Acknowledging this features raises a question: “Is the only task of the interviewer, steering and directing the interview towards the goal of receiving memories?” or “The interviewer is tasked to maintain a parallel dialogue with the narrator to discover the truth?”
This question is highlighted in discourses around the interview where the necessity of building and maintaining dialogue and its requirements with the narrator are analyzed.
In order to find a proper answer to this question we have to acknowledge that the main objective of oral history in the first place is to receive memories and record observations of the narrator as an historical document. In fact, the scholar meets with the narrator in order to add a new narrative to the existing ones and record new truths to complement and modify the existing literature. Subsequently, in such settings, recording memories is of highest priority.
However, the dialogue formed during an oral history interview might be challenging and critical and the scholar engages not as a passive audience but an active researcher, but this dialogue is not of the same quality of the classic dialogues in political and cultural and social arenas which occurs in between the experts and elites of the field.
The most important point is that in other dialogues the parties to the discourse try to share and transfer their ideas and thoughts maintaining and equal status and receive the discourse of others with flexibility and open might; however, in oral history, one party (the interviewer), despite all the information they might have over the subject (sometimes even more than the narrator) does not enjoy an equal status with the narrator. Equal status would not necessitate a discourse and record of memories. Originally, the narrator has not agreed to an interview in order to listen to what the interviewer has to say but the narrator is willing to receive and respond to the interviewers questions in a targeted and challenging interview.
In fact, the interviewer, based on information available and identified gaps, makes the effort to build a dialogue and receive the narrator’s unique information. Hence, the discourse differs in type from any other customary dialogues in other fields.
Accordingly, it has to be stated that the oral history scholar is mainly tasked to record memories however his/her mere task is not searching for the memoirs and recording the preferred stories of the narrator but builds and maintains a conducive and mutual interaction through a targeted dialogue to create a new and verifiable chapter in the history so truth discovery is a priority.
Number of Visits: 6540
The latest
- 100 Questions/ 29
- Theory One: “The Structural Duality of Opportunity–Threat in the Government’s Entry into Oral History”
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 7
- From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 29
- 100 Questions/28
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 6
- Memories of Farshid Eskandari
Most visited
- Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 6
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 28
- Memories of Farshid Eskandari
- 100 Questions/28
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 29
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 7
- From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
Photo Album from The Doctor of fly
The Doctor of fly, authored by Fatemeh Dehghan Niri, presents the memoirs of Dr. Mohammad-Taqi Khorsandi Ashtiani, Professor Emeritus and a subspecialist in Otolaryngology at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Compiled within the framework of oral history, the work recounts different stages of his life—from childhood and years of ...The Beating Pulse of a Nation at the Moment of Nowruz
Every year, in the days and nights leading up to Nowruz, Shohada Square had a special charm. A few days before the New Year, the shops would fill with customers, and street vendors would take over the sidewalks. You could find everything in their stalls (from items for the Haft Sin table, candles, goldfish, and spring flowers to clothes, bags, and shoes).The Editor's Missing Place on the “Deck”
The book From Deck to Heaven offers a relatively fresh approach to examining the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army Navy (AJA) during the eight years of the Sacred Defense, published under the “Oral History of the Islamic Revolution” series. To compile this book, the esteemed author has utilized documentary research (referring to relevant archival centers and selecting documents) and field research ...An Exceptional Haft‑Seen Table
I wanted to celebrate the new year with my family. Together with two relief workers I boarded buses designated for transporting the wounded to Choubideh and received our mission orders. We waited for a helicopter to take us to Bandar Imam Khomeini. I was stationed near the helicopter’s touchdown zone and was slight in build. As the helicopter was about to land, I could not steady myself; the breeze generated by the rotor blades lifted me off the ground.
