Publication of SAVAK docs a brave act
12 February 2013
During the Fajr decade celebration held as the National Library of Iran, manager of the Islamic Revolution Bureau said the professional production of written works on Islamic Revolution has not been achieved yet. He then considered the publication of ex-regime and SAVAK documents in the last decades a brave act.
IBNA: The Fajr Decade celebration was held this morning (February 6) at Shariatzadeh Hall of the National Library of Iran with the presence of Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi pro tempore Imam Jom'a of Tehran, Eshaq Salahi, director of the National Library, Mohammad-Ali Besharati ex-Interior Minister and Hedayatollah Behboodi, researcher of the Islamic Revolution.
Besharati, the first speaker, said: "The Britain's request for… tobacco in Iran was not a subject for the Shah to interfere with. It should also be asked why the British brought 200 thousand foreign women to Iran as labor force. By declaring the Tobacco Protest, Mirzaye Shirazi made all evil plans of British colonizers ineffective."
Then referring to Naser-alddin Shah's memoirs, he regarded Qajar kings as bon vivants who just cared for their own benefits. One example is limiting the admission of Iranian medical students that resulted in employment of physicians from Pakistan, India and Philippines that did not even understand the Language of people."
Besharati then recited parts of books written by Farideh Diba (Farah, My Daughter) and Farah Diba (The Orphan Girl) to show the attitudes of the courtiers during the Pahlavi period and emphasized that after the revolution, the authorities are obsessed with the development of the country and people.
Then researcher Hedayatollah Behboodi introduced himself as a journalist who has spent twenty years serving the people, and asked all media fellows to pay more attention to what they broadcast, as it will be used as a part of the country's historical document.
"Why is the Islamic revolution a heritage" was his first question. "It is a national heritage as it sets the goals of Iranians and forms part of the historical memory of today and tomorrow," he said.
"Having surveyed the historical events of the last three decades, I have come up with a historiographic method based on three chronological divisions:
In the first period (the 1980's) we have been mere consumers of foreign texts and the ideas of their thinkers regarding the Islamic Revolution," he asserted.
The second period (the 1990's) made a balance between foreign and domestic sources about the Islamic Revolution. "In this period the focus on oral history was a successful measure, while in the third period (2000's) internal texts gained supremacy over foreign ones.
He finally asserted that professional production of written works on Islamic Revolution has not been achieved yet, and then considered the publication of ex-regime and SAVAK documents in the last decades a brave act.
Number of Visits: 4500
The latest
Most visited
Call for Fundamental Questions in the Field of Oral History
The Oral History of Iran website invites all researchers, experts, professors, and activists in the field of oral history to share their views and experiences with the audience on the most important questions in this field. We ask you to raise a maximum of 10 fundamental questions in the field of oral history that every researcher, interviewer, and oral history enthusiast should think about, and write an answer for each in about 200 words.100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.







