Oral history of Ghasr Prison to be published
4 November 2012
Mohammad Javad Moradinia, write and history researcher, said he is currently working on the Oral History of the Ghasr Prison.
IBNA: According to the Islamic Revolution information headquarters, the book is being written based on the interviews with 30 political detainees of the prison which reflects their status under their turnkeys since 1950.
Manager of the Iranology and Islamology Department of the National Library and Archives Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran said that he chose prisoners who had served many years of their lives in the prison as political detainees under the first and second Pahlavi Shahs.
Moradinia went on to say that various section of the prison as well as the individual and collective programs of the prison including person meetings, importance events, free times, hygiene and medication are elaborated on in the book.
The interviewees varied from religious to non-religious activists who happened to be kept in the same prison under the Pahlavi dynasty for their political activities. Figures like Ahmad Ali Borhani, Mohammad Kazem Mousavi Bojnourdi, Ali Aghamohammadi, Mehdi Abdolkhodaei, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Mohammad Rajabi, Mohammad Bastehnegar, Morteza Nabavi, Moastafa Rahnama, Moradali Ahmadi, Kazem Akrami, Mehdi Ghani, Marziyeh Hadidchi, Ahmad Tavakoli, Ezat Shahi, Vajiheh Mousavi and Hadi Khamenei are some of the interviewees of the oral history project, added the book’s author.
Prior to the establishment of the Evin Prison, Ghasr was the biggest prison in Iran, and was founded in 1929 by Reza Shah. During the Islamic Revolution the prison was almost 50 years old and kept most of the political prisoners of that time.
Number of Visits: 4591
The latest
- A Look at the Book of the Restless Anonymous
- 100 Questions / 39
- A Classmates Narration of Martyr Zahra Haddad Adel
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War-39
- Explaining the “Use of Oral History in Writing Entries”
- 100 Questions / 38
- Examining the Differences in the Oral History Method of the Revolution and the War
- Oral History News of May 22nd to June 21st 2026
Most visited
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -3
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor-38
- Oral History News of May 22nd to June 21st 2026
- 100 Questions / 38
- Examining the Differences in the Oral History Method of the Revolution and the War
- Explaining the “Use of Oral History in Writing Entries”
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War-39
- A Classmates Narration of Martyr Zahra Haddad Adel
100 Questions/ 34
To what extent are we allowed to use narrative techniques (however simple) in compiling an oral history text?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.
