U.S. Supreme Court Halts Turnover Of Secret IRA Tapes



27 October 2012

By WBUR News & Wire Services October 17, 2012 Updated Oct 17, 4:15 pm

BOSTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a federal judge in Boston from turning confidential taped interviews with a former member of the Irish Republican Army over to police in Northern Ireland.

The interviews, with convicted IRA car bomber Dolours Price, were part of a Boston College oral history project on the bloody violence between Catholic and Protestant paramilitaries.

A judge had ordered that the tapes be turned over to help British police solve the IRA’s 1972 killing of a Belfast woman. But the two project researchers appealed the judge’s order, saying it would endanger their lives.

Wednesday’s stay of a lower court order by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer blocks the turnover for now.

“To a man on the guillotine, any stay is consequential,” said civil libertarian Harvey Silverglate, who has been following the case. “The case would have been over and moot had Justice Breyer not acted. So this is very important.”

Price and other former IRA members were interviewed between 2001 and 2006 as part of The Belfast Project, a resource for journalists, scholars and historians studying the long conflict in Northern Ireland known as The Troubles.

The stay holds until Nov. 18 while the full court weighs whether to take up the case.

With reporting by the WBUR Newsroom and The Associated Press, from Washington



 
Number of Visits: 4157


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 
Experts’ Answers to Oral History Questions

100 Questions/13

We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.
Book Review:

Oral History of 40 Years

One of the main hypotheses regarding the reason for the growth and expansion of oral history in the modern era relates to the fact that oral history is the best tool for addressing lesser-known topics of contemporary history. Topics that, particularly because little information is available about them, have received less attention.

Omissions in the Editing of Oral History

After the completion of interview sessions, the original recordings are archived, the interviews are transcribed, proofread, and re-listened to. If the material possesses the qualities required for publication in the form of an article or a book, the editing process must begin. In general, understanding a verbatim transcription of an interview is often not straightforward and requires editing so that it may be transformed into a fluent, well-documented text that is easy to comprehend.
Experts’ Answers to Oral History Questions

100 Questions/8

We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.