Oral history: Veteran still ‘amazed’ at the bravery of Marines in Iraq



16 July 2012

By Brian Maffly / The Salt Lake Tribune

Michael Schoenfeld spent the first days of the United States-led invasion of Iraq in the back of a seven-ton truck that offered little protection aside from a canvas cover and sandbags that quickly turned hard as concrete.

He joked to fellow servicemen that if rocket-propelled grenades were fired at them, the rounds would sail through the canvas and explode somewhere else. But the bullets they encountered on the way to, and in, Baghdad were no joke, Schoenfeld said, nor were the tactics of Saddam loyalists who hid behind civilians.

“When you go to war, you expect to fight soldiers, but you don’t expect them to use women and children as shields. It was cowardly,” said the Marine major, a company captain at the time of the invasion. His men agonized over the casualties suffered by civilians during their engagements with paramilitary units in eastern Baghdad.

Read about the American West Center’s oral history project with veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.He has shared his story with the American West Center’s oral history project at the University of Utah.

Schoenfeld, who now works for the Federal Reserve Bank, said certain aspects of his war experience have stuck with him. The way combat warped time (did that firefight last five minutes or five hours?). The bravery of the Marines he commanded.

“I continue to be amazed at their actions,” he said, “and can’t say enough about what a privilege and honor it was to have served with and led such a great group of warriors.”

Schoenfeld is among the veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts interviewed thus far for the University of Utah’s “Saving the Legacy” project at the American West Center.

The son of a career Marine, Schoenfeld grew up in Roy, Utah, and joined the Marine reserves out of high school in 1986. He underwent a fast-track officer training program and was assigned to a scout sniper platoon.

Schoenfeld joined the initial deployment in the run up to the 2003 ground invasion of Iraq. His company was part of a long convoy associated with the 1st Marine Division that hurried to Baghdad through the eastern part of Iraq, going out of its way to avoid tangling with Saddam loyalists.


Iraq war veteran Major Michael Schoenfeld (Paul Fraughton, The Salt Lake Tribune)
“That’s what they wanted us to do — bog us down, get us in fights in all these little towns along the way,” he told his University of Utah interviewer, John Worsencroft. “So the philosophy was, we’re just going to go like a bat out of hell to Baghdad.”

But the pace was interminably slow at times. Schoenfeld was intrigued by the incongruity of nomadic cultures juxtaposed with modern warfare, such as the herd of camels that trotted alongside the convoy as it moved north. Then there was the man, who turned out to be an English professor, who was herding sheep in Baghdad. At times, the scene was like stepping back to the time of Christ.

“You’d see Bedouins and these old mud huts,” Schoenfeld said. “I’m sure the people at the time were probably amazed to see this huge convoy of all these vehicles, just hour after hour after hour driving by and thinking what is going on? Because some of the Bedouins probably had no clue that there was even a war going on.”

The company’s first firefight came in the town of Al Gharraf, where the Marines rescued an artillery unit in a sandstorm, saving the life of its wounded commanding officer. The units leapfrogged forward until the troops encountered a Ba’ath Party stronghold in Al Figar.

In Baghdad, Schoenfeld’s company fought holdouts of Saddam loyalists. However, after the regime fell three weeks into the invasion, the Marines had time to tour the ancient city, enjoy cool showers and play baseball and Frisbee.

“To be honest, most of the time over there was boring. There were a few instances of excitement, but for the most part it was a pretty boring time,” Schoenfeld said. “Things started exploding soon after the Marines left Iraq. Maybe it would have been a better call to keep us there and secure the area. But that’s hindsight.”



 
Number of Visits: 4940


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (6 + 8) :
 
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions / 43

How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents

The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of Documents
More than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions / 42

What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.