MoU inked for backing Sacred Defense oral history, docs



6 June 2012

A MoU was signed between the National Library and Archives of Iran (NLAI) and Defensive Science Research Center in order to reinforce and support Sacred Defense's oral history and documents in national and international fields.

IBNA: The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was singed on May 23, by the head of Defensive Science Research Center (DSRC) Commander Hadi Moradpiri and Ishagh Salahi, the head of NLAI.

The MoU is based on supporting and participating in collection plans, organization, preserving and using Sacred Defense documents, using the capacities of NLAI in order to identify and collect documents related to Iran-Iraq's war in international levels, cooperation in the gathering process, registration and print of Sacred Defense oral history.

Gholamreza Azizi and Kazem Faramarzi were chosen as the representatives who will indeed pursue the executive processes.



 
Number of Visits: 4401


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (5 + 7) :
 

Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents

The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of Documents
More than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions / 42

What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.
A Portion of Abbas Douzduzani’s Memoirs

From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government

In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...