A report about XVI International Oral History Conference



6 September 2010

A report of XVI International Oral History Conference

 

By: Mahdi Abolhassani Taraghi,

History Instructor and PHD candidate in Islamic Iran History, Isfahan University

 

XVI International Oral History Conference was held from July 7th-11th, 2010 in Prague, Czech Republic and participated by hundreds of Oral historians. More than 700 proposals hade been presented to the conference and about 500 papers were accepted from 50 countries.

 

Organizers were as follow:

 

CZECH ORAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION

INTERNATIONAL ORAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION

INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY HISTORY, ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC

FACULTY OF HUMANITIES OF CHARLES UNIVERSITY, PRAGUE

 

The IOHA conference is held every two years in one of the country members. During the 5 days of XVI conference, 445 people presented papers in 14 themes and professional panels as follow in English and Spanish:

 

           Ecology and Disasters Environmental issues, natural heritage and cultural change

           Memories of violence, war and totalitarianism, The persecuted, civil rights, trauma and forgetting

           Memory and politics: Experience of political participation

           Islands of Freedom: The role of subculture, folklore and oral traditions in society. Alternative culture

           Memories of Family: Motherhood, fatherhood and generational exchange

           Gendering memories and the making of sexual identities: Oral Histories of gays and lesbians

           Health and Healthcare: health centers, the elderly and disabled_ health workers

           Methodological, archival and technological issues: Theory and Method in Oral History Legal and ethical

           Migrations: Exile, migratory movements, Diaspora and the search of identity

           Oral History and the Media

           Organizing Oral History: Institutions, archives, museums, organizations and grassroots groups

           Sharing-Passing on Beliefs: Religion and oral traditions

           Teaching Oral History: Experiences in formal and informal education

           The World of Work Memories and experiences, Gender and the perception of labor

 

Other than the above panels and professional meeting, some other new panels and subjects were presented that can be considered for future Oral History conferences.

On the first day, July 7th 2010, after the registration of participants and introducing programs, general sessions of the conference were held in 3 parallel sections in English and Spanish. Oral History of Education, its Methodology Analysis and Oral history Interviews and People, and Pathology were the subjects of these classes.

 

Paper presentations started on July 8th, 2010. Each panel included 9 parallel sections and each section included 4 speeches and papers.

The inauguration ceremony of XVI Oral History Conference started at 20:00 on July 8th in Charles University of Prague, in the center of this historical city.

The closing ceremony was held on July 10th, 2010 in the historical church of Saint Ann, built in 1316 in the center of Prague. In this ceremony after appreciating organizers and supporters of the conference, the awards were given and finally future programs were presented.

Oral history Education Panel was among significant parts of this conference. One of two Iranian papers, “Teaching Oral History: Experiences in Formal and Informal Education” by Mahdi Abolhassani was presented in English in Public Hall C. The audience noted this article and was followed by a Q&A session.

Abolhassany along with the paper described the activities of History Department of Isfahan University, The Bureau for this Islamic Revolution Literature, National Library and Archives Organization of IR of Iran, and other centers and institutions in using Oral History Method. He also presented some information about founding Iranian Oral History Association and organizing professional Oral History workshops.

In professional sessions of the conference, Iranian Oral history website was introduced to the researchers of other countries and some negotiations were made regarding holding mutual conferences by Iranian Oral History Association and International Oral History Association and Czech Republic Oral History Association.

 



 
Number of Visits: 7549


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (8 + 3) :
 
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions/ 34

To what extent are we allowed to use narrative techniques (however simple) in compiling an oral history text?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.
A Portion of Abbas Douzduzani’s Memoirs

From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government

In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...

Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity

The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.