A Spring Redolent of Gunpowder in the Days of the Referendum
Selected by Mahya Hafezy
Translated by Kianoush Borzouei
2026-4-8
That year I could not be with my family for Nowruz. I was not overly distressed by this—firstly because I was an army man fulfilling official duties, and secondly because I was not alone in separation; my comrades were likewise apart from their families. We endured cold, dispirited days during the Nowruz of 1358 (1979). The sole abiding recollection is that we marked the new year at the Mahabad barracks with thoughts of our families.
A few days into March of 1979, the battalion command announced that a referendum would be conducted—a vote to affirm or repudiate the nascent Islamic Republic. For the balloting a helicopter was dispatched to land in the middle of the barracks’ parade ground. Personnel went in groups and cast their ballots. The polling officials, fearing a possible counter‑revolutionary attack, hurried the process in order to depart swiftly by helicopter.
Two types of ballots had been provided: one inscribed “Islamic Republic—Yes” and the other “No.” The forces stationed at the barracks deposited the “Islamic Republic—Yes” ballots into the box; I learned this from the men in the mess hall. Voting concluded in under an hour, and the helicopter departed.
That very night, heavy gunfire erupted from within the city, signaling armed engagement. The clash resulted in the death of a police officer whose body was abandoned beside the barracks; the assailants fled, and from the following day police personnel were no longer visible within the city. By night, the town and its intersections were effectively controlled by elements of Qasemlu’s Democratic Party, garbed in what was described as Kurdish attire.[1]
[1] Source: cherik-e-Pir (The Old Guerrilla), Memoirs of Kioumars Jahan‑Ara, ed. Seyyed Vali Hashemi, Tehran: Sureh‑Mehr Publishing, 1st ed., 2018, p. 34.
Number of Visits: 697
The latest
- Narrative and the "War of Narratives" in the Era of Resistance and Imposed Wars
- Memories of Mohammad Boloori
- Call for Fundamental Questions in the Field of Oral History
- 100 Questions/49
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 49
- Jasem Ghazbanpour's narration of the first day of the war in Khorramshahr
- Memoirs of Ali Fadaei
- The Relationship Between Oral History and Biography
Most visited
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 48
- 100 Questions/48
- The Relationship Between Oral History and Biography
- Jasem Ghazbanpour's narration of the first day of the war in Khorramshahr
- Memoirs of Ali Fadaei
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 49
- 100 Questions/49
- Memories of Mohammad Boloori
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.






