Excerpt from the Memoirs of Reza Amir Sardari
Mersad
Selected by Iranian Oral History Website
Translated by Kianoush Borzouei
2025-7-29
After Iran’s acceptance of the ceasefire resolution, in addition to many prisoners of war, the Iraqis themselves anticipated that with the normalization of relations between the two countries, the fate of POWs would soon be resolved. From the very next day after Iran’s official announcement of the resolution, Iraqi newspapers launched an extensive propaganda campaign centered around Clause 6 of the UN Security Council Resolution. They published lengthy lists of statistics, figures, and historical events that had taken place prior to the war, attempting to demonstrate that Iran had been the aggressor. They swore vehemently that throughout the entire conflict, Iraq had merely acted in self-defense and had repeatedly sought reconciliation with Iran.
Every day, several pages of the English-language newspaper Baghdad Observer were dedicated to such claims. However, it didn’t take long for them to realize that invoking Clause 6 would not be as straightforward as they had hoped. At the same time, delving into the other clauses was not in their best interest either. After all, one of the prerequisites for peace was still being deliberately withheld by Iraq — Naft Shahr remained under their occupation. Thus, the focus on Clause 6 vanished, and the newspapers shifted their discourse toward Iraq’s “historic rights over the Arvand River,” crying foul and accusing Iran of usurping their rightful claims over the waterway.
What was particularly noteworthy was their clumsy attempt to rationalize the occupation of Naft Shahr. Their narrative was that “we are holding Naft Shahr so that we can secure our rights in other regions. Besides, we haven’t done anything new — Iran did the same during the Ottoman era, seizing parts of northern territory to extract concessions in the south!”
Around the same time, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) also launched a massive propaganda campaign across various media — television, radio, newspapers, and colorful magazines — focusing on Iran’s acceptance of the ceasefire. In their view, this acceptance signaled the downfall of the Islamic Republic. Massoud Rajavi even delivered a speech to his so-called “National Liberation Army,” during which he recited several verses from the Qur’an and proceeded to proclaim himself “Moses” and Maryam Rajavi as “Aaron”! With remarkable seriousness, he declared that he and his sister were divinely appointed to “save the Iranian people.”
Rajavi, however, was aware that he needed to offer some justification for the MEK’s humiliating defeat in Mehrān. So he claimed that during the fighting there, they had realized they possessed enough strength to launch an assault on Tehran itself. It was from this line of thinking that the infamous slogan, “Today Mehran, tomorrow Tehran” was born. Rajavi was confident that with the help of the “heroic and oppressed people of Iran,” who he believed were “thirsty for freedom,” victory was within reach — a victory that would be shown in a “democratic people’s government.” In the end, he shouted: “Forward to Operation Eternal Light! (Forugh-e Javidan)[1].”
Shortly after Rajavi’s speech, reports began to emerge that the MEK had launched their offensive. During this time, their television network claimed that the people of Eslamabad and Kerend-e Gharb were offering their full support. With brazen audacity, they even asserted that Iranian forces had suffered 60,000 casualties at the hands of the so-called “fighters of Eternal Light.”
Shortly after Rajavi's speech, news arrived that the Monafeqin (MEK) had launched their offensive. During this time, through television broadcasts, they repeatedly claimed that the people of Eslamabad and Kerend-e Gharb were giving them full support — and with bold shamelessness, they went so far as to assert that the Iranian army had suffered 60,000 casualties in clashes with the "Forough Javidan" combatants!
However, just a few days into the operation, the MEK’s tone shifted dramatically. It became apparent they had come to terms with the fact that conquering Tehran was not going to be as easy as they had fantasized. Their blind advance came to a halt. While they tried to rationalize their withdrawal from Mehran, claiming it was to prevent their forces from stagnating, there remained no plausible excuse for the absurd and catastrophic failure of Operation Eternal Light.
In the end, the MEK found themselves in a disastrous situation and decided to remain silent about the operation altogether. Had they been more shameless, they might have even denied that the operation had ever taken place. A week after the failure, Massoud and Maryam Rajavi held a ceremony in which the bodies of the MEK fighters killed in the operation were buried in Karbala and Najaf. The group’s monthly publication later printed photos of Iranian martyrs — lifted from Iranian newspapers — in a desperate attempt to prove their false claim of 60,000 Iranian casualties. Ironically, in order not to appear anti-popular, they claimed those martyrs belonged to the IRGC. Honestly, a pumice stone has more shame.[2]
[1] “Forugh-e Javidan” (Eternal Light) was the code name for the MEK’s final military operation, launched in western Iran.
[2]Reza Amir Sardari, From Shalamcheh to Tikrit: Memoirs from the Days of Captivity, Office of Literature and Resistance Art, Sura Publishing, Tehran, 1996, p. 71.
Number of Visits: 1580
The latest
- Javad Poyanfar's Memories
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -1
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
- Rahim Afshar's Memories
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
Most visited
- 100 Questions/ 33
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- Rahim Afshar's Memories
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.100 Questions/27
What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
