Result of Algiers Agreement between Shah and Saddam
Translated by M. B. Khoshnevisan
2023-5-17
In the winter of 1353 (1075), the Iraqi army was exhausted under the blows of the armed forces of the Kurdish people, who had been completely strengthened by the Shah's regime. Tens of thousands of Iraqi officers, non-commissioned officers, and soldiers were in the prisons of the Kurdish region. The Ba'athist regime had made several governments, including the US, a mediator for reconciliation with the Shah's regime, and was willing to give up all its claims to Arvand River, the Persian Gulf, the border areas, and Khuzestan. Also, the regime agreed not to allow the Shah's opponents to use Iraqi soil against him. The mediations took place in secret. The parties were approaching the final agreement with the mediation of the Algerian government. I was unaware of what was happening behind the scene.
In Esfand of 1353 (March 1975), I left for Baghdad to visit the holy shrines and meet Imam Khomeini. In Baghdad, and in the hotel where I stayed, they put me under surveillance. When Saddam and Shah met in the capital of Algeria and signed the famous 1975 agreement on 15th of Esfand 1353(March 6, 1975), they took me from the hotel to the detention center. A month later, they started interrogating and torturing me. The four main questions were: 1- How and where did you leave Iraq when you entered Iraq under the nickname "Hekmat" a few years ago? 2- Why did you distribute Seyed Khomeini's leaflets in different cities of Iraq and why did you print them in Lebanon? 3- What was the purpose of your trips to Libya? 4- Who are your friends and colleagues in Iran?
Between my trip to Iraq and the previous one, a network of religious retired Iraqi officers and civilians who had connections with Libya ad been discovered. The intelligence organization of the Ba'ath Party had penetrated this network and obtained a lot of information about the movements of its members. This network had bought a typewriter from Mr. Salehi Fahmi and used it to print secret leaflets. He had also been arrested. He was sentenced to some time in prison and others were all or mostly executed. During my trips to Iraq, I used to go to his bookstore in Al-Rashid Street in Baghdad. Last time, and before his arrest, I also went to his house. His brother, Sadegh Fahmi, who fled from Iraq to Lebanon in 1348 (1970) and was in contact with anti-Ba'ath Sunni Muslim officers, was always with me, or was in close contact. In my case, the Iraqi security apparatus suspected that I might have been involved in promoting the work of this network during my trips to Libya. In any case, they had a good excuse to get information about how I communicated with the Libyan government regarding the Shah's regime.
I was in the prison of the Ba'athists for four months. I had not told anyone that I was going to Iraq. I had told only one person that I was going to Lebanon. For this reason, my friends and colleagues thought that I had been kidnapped from Lebanon by a secret SAVAK unit and taken to Tehran. The efforts by the security forces of Al-Fat'h to find me had also failed. The rumor of my abduction by SAVAK was spread not only among the Iranians abroad but also in the circles of Muslim fighters inside. This situation prompted the Ba'athists to release me earlier in order to preserve their reputation. After being released from the Ba'ath prison, and the reconciliation of the Ba'athists with the Shah, and in the same two-three days when I was in Baghdad, some clerics who were in Najaf came to visit me. I informed one of them about my torture and interrogation about printing and distributing the Imam's leaflets.
Source: Farsi, Jalaleddin, Dark Angles, Tehran, Hadith Publications, 1373 (1995), PP. 350-351
Number of Visits: 3455
The latest
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- 100 Questions/15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 15
- A Critical Look at Pioneers of the Valley of Light
Most visited
- The Artillery of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
- A Critical Look at Pioneers of the Valley of Light
- 100 Questions/14
- Translation in Oral History and Its Potential Pitfalls
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- 100 Questions/15
Omissions in the Editing of Oral History
After the completion of interview sessions, the original recordings are archived, the interviews are transcribed, proofread, and re-listened to. If the material possesses the qualities required for publication in the form of an article or a book, the editing process must begin. In general, understanding a verbatim transcription of an interview is often not straightforward and requires editing so that it may be transformed into a fluent, well-documented text that is easy to comprehend.100 Questions/8
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.The Role of Objects in Oral Narrative
Philosophers refer to anything that exists—or possesses the potential to exist—as an object. This concept may manifest in material forms, abstract notions, and even human emotions and lived experiences. In other words, an object encompasses a vast spectrum of beings and phenomena, each endowed with particular attributes and characteristics, and apprehensible in diverse modalities.100 Questions/6
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.