Is Oral History an Art?

Compiled by: Hamid Qazvini
Translated by: Fazel Shirzad

2023-1-3


One of the questions facing researchers over time is whether history is a science or a phenomenon of art? A question that has different philosophical answers.

In raising this question, Professor Motahari says: “History books have two flaws. One is that most historians were hired by the powers of the time, so they wrote history in their favor. Second, the historians had a national, religious or any other bias that wrote the events according to their beliefs, without writing lies. It’s like drawing only beauties or only ugliness when drawing a face; this face is not true. This is because some have said: history is not a science, but an art, because science means discovering events as they were, and art means making something as we want. Every historian is an artist for himself, that is, he made history according to his own will. Philosophically speaking, the artefact of a historian has substance and form; honest historians have not interfered in the material, but they have changed the form. Historians, who are not trustworthy, have changed the matter and form together.”[1]

Regardless of which of these definitions we agree with and without wanting to enter into phenomenological discussions, we should pay attention to this question from a methodological point of view, what is the relationship between the art of the oral history researcher and this goal? Indeed, to what extent is his art and power influential in the formation of the text, and is this influence merely a matter of appearance or is it also involved in the meaning and content?

It is clear that from the first moments of the interview to the final compilation of the text and its publication, the researcher’s art plays a decisive role in all stages and represents a form of truth according to his recognition and ability. Of course, the more this work proceeds in a more researched and targeted process, the more reassuring it is, in this way, we should not forget that oral history relies on the art of the researcher and the narrator’s narration, and its output will add to the society’s knowledge reserve, which provides the basis for scientific exploitation. Just as every written document relies on the taste and taste of its creator at the time of production, and on the way of research and reading, it relies on the knowledge and discernment of the researcher, and this feature will never be far from the way of encountering any historical work.

Therefore, it should be noted that although there are questions in the evaluation and verification of the oral history text like any other historical text; but the final output cannot remain without the taste and art of the oral history writer. For this reason, it has been observed many times that the rules used in each work of oral history are different from other works, because the conditions and contexts of the work and the topic under discussion have their own requirements, and it is the author’s art that brings out the final product.

 

[1] Motahari, Morteza, Philosophy of History, Vol. 1, Sadra Publications, p. 125

 



 
Number of Visits: 1370


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 
Book Review

Kak-e Khak

The book “Kak-e Khak” is the narration of Mohammad Reza Ahmadi (Haj Habib), a commander in Kurdistan fronts. It has been published by Sarv-e Sorkh Publications in 500 copies in spring of 1400 (2022) and in 574 pages. Fatemeh Ghanbari has edited the book and the interview was conducted with the cooperation of Hossein Zahmatkesh.

Is oral history the words of people who have not been seen?

Some are of the view that oral history is useful because it is the words of people who have not been seen. It is meant by people who have not been seen, those who have not had any title or position. If we look at oral history from this point of view, it will be objected why the oral memories of famous people such as revolutionary leaders or war commanders are compiled.

Daily Notes of a Mother

Memories of Ashraf-al Sadat Sistani
They bring Javad's body in front of the house. His mother comes forward and says to lay him down and recite Ziarat Warith. His uncle recites Ziarat and then tells take him to the mosque which is in the middle of the street and pray the funeral prayer (Ṣalāt al-Janāzah) so that those who do not know what the funeral prayer is to learn it.

A Critique on Oral history of War Commanders

“Answering Historical Questions and Ambiguities Instead of Individual-Organizational Identification”
“Oral history of Commanders” is reviewed with the assumption that in the field of war historiography, applying this method is narrated in an advancing “new” way, with the aim of war historiography, emphasizing role of commanders in creation of its situations and details.