Contemplation on the relationship between oral history and historical sociology
Hamid Qazvini
Translated by: M. B. Khoshnevisan
2025-3-3
Historical sociology is a subfield of sociology that focuses on the processes and development of social structures in history with a rational, critical, and creative perspective.
This interdisciplinary science, combining history and sociology, studies social structures, processes, and social developments in the context of time.
The goal of sociological studies is to measure the influence of social forces on individual actions, seeking to find the rules governing human behavior to predict and control social events. History attempts to understand events and the main essence of phenomena by utilizing sources.[1]
Combining the two naturally forms historical sociology, answering how societies live and change throughout history.[2]
In simple terms, historical sociology is the study of the past to understand how societies function and change. It has garnered attention from historians and sociologists studying the interaction of past and present, events, processes, activism, and structuring.[3]
Now, we must explore whether oral history can contribute to strengthening historical sociology by collecting large and small qualitative data. Can sociology help examine lived experiences by recording the memories, observations, and actions of individuals? Oral history provides insights into experiences and details of daily life, social relations, and the impact of social and historical structures not recorded in official documents or correspondence.
Oral history has the potential to provide sociologists with greater depth of knowledge. For instance, interviews with individuals present during historical events like the Islamic Revolution or the Sacred Defense offer researchers in-depth, first-hand information about the lives and times of people, their connection to the events, and the social and psychological effects on society.
Oral history data is highly flexible due to its informality and diversity, allowing for multifaceted analysis of identity, social resistance, and cultural change. By collecting individuals’ experiences of social change, oral history helps historical sociology deepen understanding of long-term trends and how social structures influence individuals’ lives and vice versa.
This connection creates a deeper understanding of social and historical relationships, painting a more comprehensive picture of social change. Oral history helps analyze social processes not only from the perspective of elites and macrostructures but also from the viewpoint of individuals who experienced these changes, filling gaps in purely macroscopic analyses. By documenting individual narratives, oral history helps historical sociology analyze the interaction between individual decisions and structural pressures, such as examining the impact of macroeconomic policies on the daily lives of different classes through oral interviews.
Furthermore, oral history helps examine the extent of the human factor's influence in shaping historical and social developments. Written documents and official sources often lack information about marginalized groups, minorities, or weaker classes of society; oral history compensates for this deficiency, providing a more complete image of society.
Oral history is a rich source for analyzing popular culture and changes in value systems, such as collecting oral memories about religious traditions and beliefs in different societies over time. Therefore, oral history complements historical sociology as a reliable tool, playing an effective role in deepening understanding.
[1] Tavassoli, Gholam Abbas, Sociological Theories, Tehran, Samt, 1376 (1997), p.52.
[2] Akbari, Yunis and Shahram Ardeshirian, "Historical Sociology: Concepts, Theories, and Methods", Kharazmi's Chronology - Specialized Scientific Quarterly -, Year 1, Issue 3, Spring 1393 (2014), p. 1.
[3] Smith, Dennis, The Rise of Historical Sociology, translated by Hashem Aghajari, Tehran, Morvarid Publications, 1380 (2001), P. 16.
Number of Visits: 878
The latest
Most visited
How to send Imam's announcements to Iran
In the first part, the issue of funds, Hajj Sheikh Nasrallah Khalkhali - who represented most of the religious authorities - was also the representative of Imam. In Najaf, there was a money exchange office that cooperated with the money exchange offices in Tehran. Some of the funds were exchanged through him.Operation Beit al-Moqaddas and Liberation of Khorramshahr
After Operation Fat’h al-Mobin, we traveled to Kermanshah and visited Sar-e-Pol-e-Zahab before heading to Ilam. During Operation Beit al-Moqaddas, the 27th Brigade was still receiving support from the West. We maintained contact with individuals who had previously worked in Area 7 and were now leading the brigade. It was through these connections that I learned about Operation Beit al-Moqaddas.Memoirs of Hujjat al-Islam Reza Motalebi
Hujjat al-Islam Reza Motalebi is a cleric from Isfahan. Before the revolution, he was the imam of the Fallah Mosque – which was later renamed Abuzar Mosque. By his presence and efforts, Abuzar Mosque soon became a base for supporters of the Imam and the revolution. After the victory of the revolution, he played a role in uniting forces and maintaining political vitality in southwest Tehran.The Necessity of Receiving Feedback in Oral History
Whenever we engage in a task, we naturally seek ways to evaluate our performance — to correct shortcomings and enhance strengths. Such refinement is only possible through the feedback we receive from others. Consider, for instance, a basketball player whose shots are consistently accurate; should he begin shooting blindfolded, his success rate would rapidly decline, as he would be deprived of essential feedback from each attempt.
