Contemplation on the relationship between oral history and historical sociology

Hamid Qazvini
Translated by: M. B. Khoshnevisan

2025-3-3


Historical sociology is a subfield of sociology that focuses on the processes and development of social structures in history with a rational, critical, and creative perspective.

This interdisciplinary science, combining history and sociology, studies social structures, processes, and social developments in the context of time.

The goal of sociological studies is to measure the influence of social forces on individual actions, seeking to find the rules governing human behavior to predict and control social events. History attempts to understand events and the main essence of phenomena by utilizing sources.[1]

Combining the two naturally forms historical sociology, answering how societies live and change throughout history.[2]

In simple terms, historical sociology is the study of the past to understand how societies function and change. It has garnered attention from historians and sociologists studying the interaction of past and present, events, processes, activism, and structuring.[3]

Now, we must explore whether oral history can contribute to strengthening historical sociology by collecting large and small qualitative data. Can sociology help examine lived experiences by recording the memories, observations, and actions of individuals? Oral history provides insights into experiences and details of daily life, social relations, and the impact of social and historical structures not recorded in official documents or correspondence.

Oral history has the potential to provide sociologists with greater depth of knowledge. For instance, interviews with individuals present during historical events like the Islamic Revolution or the Sacred Defense offer researchers in-depth, first-hand information about the lives and times of people, their connection to the events, and the social and psychological effects on society.

Oral history data is highly flexible due to its informality and diversity, allowing for multifaceted analysis of identity, social resistance, and cultural change. By collecting individuals’ experiences of social change, oral history helps historical sociology deepen understanding of long-term trends and how social structures influence individuals’ lives and vice versa.

This connection creates a deeper understanding of social and historical relationships, painting a more comprehensive picture of social change. Oral history helps analyze social processes not only from the perspective of elites and macrostructures but also from the viewpoint of individuals who experienced these changes, filling gaps in purely macroscopic analyses. By documenting individual narratives, oral history helps historical sociology analyze the interaction between individual decisions and structural pressures, such as examining the impact of macroeconomic policies on the daily lives of different classes through oral interviews.

Furthermore, oral history helps examine the extent of the human factor's influence in shaping historical and social developments. Written documents and official sources often lack information about marginalized groups, minorities, or weaker classes of society; oral history compensates for this deficiency, providing a more complete image of society.

Oral history is a rich source for analyzing popular culture and changes in value systems, such as collecting oral memories about religious traditions and beliefs in different societies over time. Therefore, oral history complements historical sociology as a reliable tool, playing an effective role in deepening understanding.

 


[1] Tavassoli, Gholam Abbas, Sociological Theories, Tehran, Samt, 1376 (1997), p.52.

[2] Akbari, Yunis and Shahram Ardeshirian, "Historical Sociology: Concepts, Theories, and Methods", Kharazmi's Chronology - Specialized Scientific Quarterly -, Year 1, Issue 3, Spring 1393 (2014), p. 1.

[3] Smith, Dennis, The Rise of Historical Sociology, translated by Hashem Aghajari, Tehran, Morvarid Publications, 1380 (2001), P. 16.

 



 
Number of Visits: 1902


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (1 + 7) :
 
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions/ 34

To what extent are we allowed to use narrative techniques (however simple) in compiling an oral history text?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.
A Portion of Abbas Douzduzani’s Memoirs

From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government

In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...

Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity

The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.