Oral History Workshop – 3
Documents and interviews
Shahed Yazdan
Translated by M. B. Khoshnevisan
2022-12-20
The oral history website is going to provide the educational materials of some oral history workshops to the audience in written form. The present series has been prepared using the materials of one of these workshops. As you will see, many of the provided contents are not original or less said contents, but we have tried to provide categorized contents so that they can be used more.
Document
Since oral history is a history, it must be documented and quoted from a document, so here we claim that memory is a document; but is memory really a document?
In the past, up to about 40-50 years ago, written (paper) items were called documents, but nowadays oral workers call everything that has "indication" and indicates an event, incident, speech, or the like as documents. For example, when someone says "I went and targeted a tank", because his statement indicates an incident, it is a document.
Some, including the history professors of decades ago who traditionally think about this issue, do not agree with this definition. From the point of view of these people, these items are not documents but "evidence". These people do not accept anything but paper as a document, but nowadays, due to the spread of oral history, they have accepted in all the universities of the world that the traditional definition of a document no longer applies and we have an oral document.
Thus, from this point of view, memory "can" be a document.
Oral tradition
Oral tradition is the stories and proverbs that our grandfathers and grandmothers tell us, and these traditions have been quoted chest to chest from the past. But these cases have no reference and time. These cases are not considered as oral history, but are included in the category of oral tradition. These are customs that are transferred orally from one generation to another.
Interview
We said that the method of obtaining memory is the interview; but we have several interview models. In terms of method, interviews are classified into various categories such as written, telephone, fax, internet, etc., but the thing that answers our work in oral history is the face-to-face oral interview. This type of interview, apart from the interview technique, has also social customs. Because of this, the oral history interview will be difficult.
In terms of content, interviews are divided into superficial interviews and in-depth interviews. A superficial interview is a press interview; for this reason, reporters who interview people for the press are not necessarily good interviewers for oral history because an interview in oral history should be an in-depth interview. In a superficial interview, we ask the question to get the answer, but in an in-depth interview, we ask the question to get the answer and be convinced. In the oral history, we should not give up until we are satisfied because otherwise this interview will be a weak one.
Superficial interview →we ask questions →we get the answers
In-depth interview→ we ask questions→ we get answers→ we are convinced
For instance, if someone said: "We were two and took ten RPG rockets and went by a motorcycle and targeted twenty tanks..." we should be allowed not to be satisfied because in the best case, if all the rockets hit the target and nothing else happen, no more than ten tanks will be destroyed.
Or a sentinel of watchtower had said in his memoirs that during my watching in 24 hours, we took 24,000 dead from the enemy. Can you imagine if they put 24,000 dead together, what area is needed? Even if these bodies are placed in two or three layers, a lot of space is needed, which cannot be placed in the limited space of the war pad; therefore, one should not be easily convinced with what the interviewee said.
In oral history and by using in-depth interview, the interviewer is convinced; but in superficial (press) interview, the answers of the interviewee are just heard. |
In oral history, the interviewer must also have characteristics such as having information dominance over the subject of the interview, because if he or she does not have enough information about the subject of the interview, he or she may not be able to be convinced. For this reason, the oral interviewer is said to be an oral "historian".
Supplementary interview
Since being convinced in an in-depth interview is of great importance, we need a supplementary interview. Compilation of oral history without a supplementary interview has no meaning. By using the supplemental interview, the points and parts that are missing from the initial interview or the ones that are needed to be reviewed and completed, will be corrected.
Number of Visits: 2387








The latest
- An Eternal Lie!
- The 368th Night of Remembrance – Part 2
- Agents in Search for the Fighter
- The Embankment Wounded Shoulders – 13
- The Necessity of Standardizing Oral History and Criticism of General Mohsen Rezaei
- The 368th Night of Remembrance – Part 1
- Oral History News of Khordad 1404 (May 22nd – June 21st 2025)
- Najaf Headquarters Human Resources
Most visited
- Najaf Headquarters Human Resources
- Oral History News of Khordad 1404 (May 22nd – June 21st 2025)
- The Necessity of Standardizing Oral History and Criticism of General Mohsen Rezaei
- The 368th Night of Remembrance – Part 1
- The Embankment Wounded Shoulders – 13
- Agents in Search for the Fighter
- The 368th Night of Remembrance – Part 2
- An Eternal Lie!
Operation Beit al-Moqaddas and Liberation of Khorramshahr
After Operation Fat’h al-Mobin, we traveled to Kermanshah and visited Sar-e-Pol-e-Zahab before heading to Ilam. During Operation Beit al-Moqaddas, the 27th Brigade was still receiving support from the West. We maintained contact with individuals who had previously worked in Area 7 and were now leading the brigade. It was through these connections that I learned about Operation Beit al-Moqaddas.Memoirs of Hujjat al-Islam Reza Motalebi
Hujjat al-Islam Reza Motalebi is a cleric from Isfahan. Before the revolution, he was the imam of the Fallah Mosque – which was later renamed Abuzar Mosque. By his presence and efforts, Abuzar Mosque soon became a base for supporters of the Imam and the revolution. After the victory of the revolution, he played a role in uniting forces and maintaining political vitality in southwest Tehran.The Necessity of Receiving Feedback in Oral History
Whenever we engage in a task, we naturally seek ways to evaluate our performance — to correct shortcomings and enhance strengths. Such refinement is only possible through the feedback we receive from others. Consider, for instance, a basketball player whose shots are consistently accurate; should he begin shooting blindfolded, his success rate would rapidly decline, as he would be deprived of essential feedback from each attempt.Sir Saeed
The book “Sir Saeed” is a documentary [narrative] of the life of martyr Seyyed Mohammad Saeed Jafari, written by Mohammad Mehdi Hemmati and published by Rahiyar Publications. In March 2024, this book was recognized as one of the selected documentary biographies in the 21st edition of the Sacred Defense Book of the Year Award. The following text is a review on the mentioned book.
