Haj Ahmad Metovaslian and a Hat belonged to Public Treasury
Narrator: Mojtaba Askari
Translator: Fazel Shirzad
2023-4-25
The village of Najjar near Paveh had a population of approximately one hundred and fifty sixty people; about 40 families. The first village after Paveh was towards Nowsud and did not have a very strategic military position; but we had to capture it to be able to go to the new direction. In the morning of one of the winter days of 1979, a number of non-native guards and honorary guards of Paveh went to Nausud. The anti-revolution was resisting from within the village of Najjar itself. The children suggested that we hit the village with 106 bullets.
I heard this phrase from Haj Ahmad [Mutovaslian] himself, who said: "No. According to Imam's fatwa, I do not have permission to attack the village with heavy weapons. You hit the houses that are shooting with caliber 50; but if we hit 106, maybe innocent people will get hurt. Not advisable." If he did, he would capture the village within ten minutes. Due to the fact that a good counter-revolutionary had taken refuge in that village, we could not capture the village at that stage. Perhaps one of the reasons was that Ahmed did not allow a violent conflict.
From the morning when we started the operation, it didn't take more than one or two hours to besiege it; but we did not enter the village. The anti-revolutionary had taken shelter inside, and if we carried out severe operations, people would be harmed; But we did tactical and guerilla operations. There, I was shot in my left leg and I was wounded... With the help of the comrades, we went to the shelter. We decided to retreat.
The characteristic of Haj Ahmad was that he would come to check and take a census to see if all the children had returned or not. As he was doing these things, the hat fell off his head. It fell from the hill and forty to fifty meters below, it fell into the valley. Haj Ahmad recognized that if he went and fetched the hat, his life would not be in danger. It was hard work, but he went down and brought the hat. When he came up, the comrades asked, "Why did you go looking for your hat?" He said: "Because it is belonged to Public treasury. It should not be belonged to counter-revolutionists."
Source: The book of standing forever, edited by Fatemeh Vafaizadeh, Iran Publications, 2022.
Number of Visits: 3356
The latest
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- 100 Questions/46
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 46
- Theory Six: The Inevitability of Perspective
- Memoirs of Behzad Rastegari
Most visited
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.
