The questions of oral historys interview (part I)

A Strong Interview Is Tied with Research

Akram Dashtban
Translated by: Fazel Shirzad


Note: Following report is based on an invitation in which history experts are asked questions about oral history. In this regard, one of experts, as his perspective, has answered to one of questions titled "what are characteristics of the questions of oral history's interview"; Kianoush Haftlang (PhD) presented his responses in the form of notes that we'll read these comments as follows.

Oral history studies on the knowledge and experiences of informed individuals about events in an active, informed, and targeted conversation, and records audio and video tapes This method (i.e. oral history) is an important and necessary tool for understanding the past not so distant, and preserving the past of each individual and historical flows in various dimensions for the future.

Subject-tracking in oral history (interview's topic)

The first step for a creative dialogue and interview in oral history is selecting the subject or topic for interview. We must clearly know someone who we are going to interview with, and something what we are going to speak about, is the subject of interview about interviewee? Or someone else? What you are going to speak about?

Choosing a case and good subject is the first condition for conducting a substantive interview. Interview means conversation. But in practice, each of these words has different meanings and uses, and an interviewer needs to pay attention to them.

When two people communicate with each other verbally, conversation takes place. But necessarily this conversation does not mean an interview. Many telephonic talks and daily dialogues of people are conversational one. Interviews take place in the form of journalistic and oral history. In the interview, reporter asks number of questions for interviewee and get answers, while these questions are independent in the same unity.

In many cases, the first and second questions are not related to each other and are exactly made in the form of a written interview to answer the question of journalist who is not present. But questions, in spite of united, are interconnected and related. There is a kind of challenge between parties. In other words, it involves controversy or discussion. The first question, that is raised, is always in the aspect of the interview, and if reporter and interviewer are master on subject and familiar with interview techniques, s/he will be able to direct it toward a conversation.

Preparation before the interview

In addition to familiar with technique and methodology, interviewer should carefully study on topic of interview: before interviewing about subject, the use of archives, the study of document related to subject and the study of related subject books are such examples of gaining information. Professional researcher makes an interview stronger, more rigorous and richer forces.

Interviewee's situations in oral history

 Interviewee should be informed before doing interview and given outline to prepare for herself/ himself, preferably write down or keep in his mind. The framework of interview should be already specified. We should not forget that we want response for unknown, not known, each question should have exact timing, the interviewer should take subject into consideration, and recorded interview should be transcribed, edited and legal issues should be raised and edited text should be signed by narrator.

How to make a fascinating interview

In addition information and expertise required on the subject of interview, the techniques of interview should also be mastered in order to provide a great interview. You should have full knowledge on the characteristics of a professional interview. How an interview is started, promoted and finished, providing portraiture and description in an interview, take notes and how to use them, and finally the way of arranging an interview are  the points that if they are paid attention and considered, they causes interview to be enjoyable and interesting for readers.

Iranian oral history website asks question to experts about oral history, and publish responses to readers. Total responses will have remarkable results. If you have question, please feel free to submit it via this page to read comments from experts of oral history!

Number of Visits: 2785


Full Name:

Radio Abadan and the Sad Story of Khorramshahr

The comrades from the Khorramshahr Revolutionary Guards were very brave people. When Khorramshahr was occupied by the enemy, they sometimes went beyond the sight of the enemy to gather information and reconnaissance, and reached the farthest alleys and occupied neighborhoods. The information thus obtained from the situation of the invading forces and how they were stationed in the homes of the people of Khorramshahr and the equipment and communication of the occupying mercenaries ...

Significance and Function of Oral History in Documenting Organizational Knowledge and History – 2

Dr. Abolfazl Hasanabadi, Dr. Habibollah Esmaeeli and Dr. Mehdi Abolhasani participated in the fifth meeting out of the series of meetings on oral history in Iran hosted by Mrs. Mosafa. In the meeting set up in the History Hallway of the Clubhouse, they talked about “the significance and function of oral history in documenting organizational knowledge and history”. In continuation of the show, the host invited Dr. Hasanabadi to continue talks about ...

Book review: “Line of Blacksmiths”

Autobiographical memoirs of a young man from Dezful during the imposed war The "Line of Blacksmiths" uses a beautiful front cover which enjoys elegance and taste in its design; as the selected text on the back cover is proof of the authenticity and belief that shows the Iranian combatant proud and the real winner of the imposed war: "I went to get my gun. They were looking at me. Their crying and begging increased.

Excerpts from Memoirs of Abdullah Salehi

On the 28th of September 1980, in the back alleys of the Taleghani [Khorramshahr] neighborhood, we clashed with Iraqi artillery. Speed of action was important. If we reacted late, the rackets would hit us. Sometimes I lurked behind the alleys so that I could surprise the Iraqis. In one of these ambushes, I turned off the car so that they would not hear his voice. I was waiting for the head of the truck to be found across the street.