Oral History Workshop – 4

Difference between memory and oral history

Shahed Yazdan
Translated by M. B. Khoshnevisan


The oral history website is going to provide the educational materials of some oral history workshops to the audience in written form. The present series has been prepared using the materials of one of these workshops. As you will see, many of the provided contents are not original or less said contents, but we have tried to provide categorized contents so that they can be used more.


Difference between memory books and oral history

Unfortunately, many of those who put the name of memory or oral history on a book, do not know the difference between the two; for this reason, we see the same books, some of which have the name of memory and some others are named as oral history.
In "memory" the main element is "narrator"; but in "oral history" the main element is "interview". Because the interviewer is supposed to be convinced, deep questions are asked from the interviewee and he or she starts discussing with him or her. What turns memory into oral history is the discussion that the interviewer has with the interviewee.
A book in which no discussion has happened and in that interview, the interviewer is not convinced is not an oral history!
Some university professors believe that memory has one subject and that is the narrator; but oral history has two subjects; narrator and interviewer.


Wherever the interviewer asked and discussed (and not an argument; an argument is different from a discussion) and was convinced and the inadvertent errors were corrected and eliminated, we can put the title of oral history on the work; but if the narrator only spoke and the interviewer only listened, it is called memory.


Advantages of oral history

• The first benefit of oral history is that it is factory-to-consumer.

For example, an event happened yesterday and the narrator is narrating it today. But in written history, after the document is produced, it takes at least 30 years before it is permitted to be published. Is any document provided or not? Those who were in that event may have passed away; the people who are going to compile it, have no knowledge of the subject and...

• Oral history is the history of unseen people.

For example, in the documents of the IRGC, Jihad, the army, etc., there is not much mention of an ordinary combatant. Most of the names in these documents are the names of high-ranking commanders or different units. It is the same in political, economic, cultural, social, and other documents. Official documents are documents of the heads and the body is not seen in these documents. For this reason, it is said that oral history is people's history and written history is government history.
One of the characteristics of oral history that became popular after the Second World War, with the invention of the tape recorder, was that soldiers were seen fighting in the war, but only the names of the commanders were mentioned. Winston Churchill's memoirs win the Nobel Prize for Literature, but the soldiers who participated in the war are not seen.
•Official history shows the scene, but oral history reveals to us a behind-the-scenes that is both more fascinating and more real.
For instance, in a period, Brigadier General Mohammad Kowsari, the commander of the 27th Division of Mohammad Rasulullah (PBUH), requested 250 masks from the headquarters with a piece of paper. When they went to get the masks, there were fewer masks available and they handed over the ones that were available. Later, when the documents of the 27th division were published, it was stated that on that date, 250 masks were delivered to the 27th division, while this number was not correct.
• Some believe that oral history conveys the spirit of the case, and official history conveys only the body.
For example, when two cars collide, when the police shows up and sketches the accident scene, it is like an official date; but if we inquire about the matter from the point of view of a person who observed this happening from above, we may find out many points about how this accident happened in order to be able to investigate its reasons more completely.

Number of Visits: 1519


Full Name:

Nurse of Fav Hospital

“I didn’t see this event in Ayoubi Hospital, but I did in Fav Hospital exactly. At least once a day, we witnessed the flight of Iraqi jets from that area which came to strike the hospital. Of course, our forces poured so much dirt and sand on the concrete roof of the hospital that it became like a hill, and the guys could hardly understand the sound of the bomb and...

Report on the Fourteenth Conference of Oral History- 3rd and final part

Connecting oral history to the body of power is traumatic
According to the Iranian Oral History Website, the 14th Oral History Conference titled “Oral History on Scale” was held by the History Department of the University of Isfahan and the Oral History Association of Iran on Tuesday morning, May 14, 2024; professors, experts, and ...
A review of twenty years of oral history in Iran

Scientific and professional authority; perspective of Iranian Oral History Association

If a person has a personal library in his or her house, one or more oral history books are seen among them. In recent decades, the wave of book lovers has turned towards the field of oral history, and all this rising trend is owed to the activists in this field.


A memory from Asadollah Tajrishi
At the beginning of my arrival in Evin Prison, I was taken to solitary confinement as always and after a few days, I was transferred to the public cell. The public cells had been located in two floors. The arrangement of these cells in the cells of 1355 and 1356 was such that on the lower floor, there was a ward ...