A narration from the event of 17th of Shahrivar
Translated by: M.B. Khoshnevisan
2025-4-28
Early on the morning of Friday, 17th of Shahrivar 1357 (September 17, 1978), I found myself in an area I was familiar with, unaware of the gathering that would form there and the intense reaction it would provoke. I had anticipated a march similar to previous days, so I ventured onto the street with a tape recorder I had brought back from my recent trip abroad. As I entered Saqabashi Street, I was met with an unusual scene. Smoke billowed from the square, and young people, along with others, were fleeing in a panic. They appeared flushed, terrified, and dressed in dirty, disheveled clothing. Naturally, I found myself swept up in the crowd, despite standing out with my clean and tidy attire, as well as the presence of my tape recorder. I was on a mission to document the events of the day, so I diligently recorded the voices, slogans, and chaos unfolding around me. The forces stationed in Zhaleh Square were launching attacks, and on two occasions, individuals were seen firing shots from rooftops overlooking the area. It turned out that the individuals shooting from the rooftops were actually SAVAK agents. They were firing into the air to escalate tensions in the area. As I was affected by this tense atmosphere, a group of people grew suspicious of me and detained me, questioning me repeatedly. They believed I was an agent, possibly from SAVAK, attempting to gather information from behind enemy lines. They confiscated my tape recorder, and I was on the brink of being attacked until one person in the group, the son of an acquaintance, recognized me and intervened. He managed to retrieve my tape recorder and return it to me, saving me from harm. I resumed recording because the content was crucial for editing and sharing news with forces abroad. I was in communication with contacts overseas, preparing the tape to send for release. However, I encountered another unfamiliar group that forcefully took the recording from me, resulting in the loss of the tape. Despite my pleas for its return, they refused, leaving me without both the tape and the recorder.
I remember that day vividly. All the residents of the houses on the streets of Iran, Saqabashi, Gote, and all the streets leading to Zhaleh Square opened their doors. The officers were following the crowd and the people, so the residents there also sheltered the people. They received the wounded in their homes and bandaged their wounds with primary equipment. Many people took out their cloths and sheets from inside their homes so that the demonstrators could wrap the wounded or those who might have died in them. In other words, there was a broad and widespread collective cooperation among the people, without prior knowledge or preparation. People cooperated to the fullest extent with the youth and those who had clashed with the officers and the army forces. This was the first incident in the years before the revolution where people spontaneously cooperated with the fighting forces. In the years before that, especially in the second half of the 1340s (1960s), when conflicts arose between political groups opposed to the regime and the agents, people were cautious.
It appears that this was the first event in the years leading up to the revolution where people displayed their willingness and enthusiasm to participate in practical events during challenging social situations, showcasing their readiness and capability.
Source: Sixty Years of Resistance and Service – Memoirs of Engineer Mohammad Tavsoli, Tehran, Kavir Publications, 1398 (2019), pp. 209-211
Number of Visits: 1753
The latest
- Memories of Davoud Molaei
- Preparing a report for Khorasan Radio and Television
- 100 Questions/47
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- 100 Questions/46
Most visited
- Theory Six: The Inevitability of Perspective
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 46
- 100 Questions/46
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
- 100 Questions/47
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.