The statement of a problem;
Corona Oral History; Sooner or Later
A flip on personal thoughts based on information
Malihe Kamaledin
Translated by: Fazel Shirzad
2020-5-19
This note is intended to state an issue and prelude on an idea, and it is not intended to estimate the values positively or negatively.
Passed some years of oral history’s activities in Iran and the holding of numerous and specialized meetings, there is still no comprehensive definition among the activists of this profession about the theoretical frameworks of oral history, text editing and many related issues. They are different opinion and reasons in this field.
Recently, when an uncontrollable virus entered Iran and the world, some news agencies and institutions collected memoirs and interviews with medical staff and patients who were treated, and even held a memoir writing match.
These efforts make some people to be wonder if the memories of these days are oral history.
Different answers were obtained by asking a few experts, or field research - but limited and not extensive and deep. Of course, none of the answers were one-word. For example, the views of two contemporary historians were completely contradictory. Here, the issue is raised:
- If oral history must be a distant history, can it be generalized to the present and current history?
-Do we have to wait for all aspects and dimensions of the story to be clarified and time to pass, and then be read as oral history?
-Does oral history, based on memory, have an effect on finding an answer if it is science or method?
-If these memories are considered oral history, should they be autographs or obtained from interview?
And other questions like these…
But there is a point in asking these questions and getting not-so-straightforward answers. Wouldn't it have been easier to access some of the information and to understand that time when cholera was spread, and if the people's memoirs had been published in the periodicals of that time, or if the manuscripts of the that people had been remained available for today?
Perhaps the memories, which are being collected today, will be combined in the future and used by historians, or by other individuals and institutions.
These questions and concerns were raised only for consensus on various aspects of the issue. Hopefully it will be a prelude to a specialized reflection.
Number of Visits: 5141
The latest
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 17
- Oral History News of December-January 2026
- Analyzing the Impact of Sacred Defense Memories on the New Generation: Usage in Transmitting Values
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- 100 Questions/15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
Most visited
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- 100 Questions/15
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Analyzing the Impact of Sacred Defense Memories on the New Generation: Usage in Transmitting Values
- Oral History News of December-January 2026
Oral History of 40 Years
One of the main hypotheses regarding the reason for the growth and expansion of oral history in the modern era relates to the fact that oral history is the best tool for addressing lesser-known topics of contemporary history. Topics that, particularly because little information is available about them, have received less attention.Omissions in the Editing of Oral History
After the completion of interview sessions, the original recordings are archived, the interviews are transcribed, proofread, and re-listened to. If the material possesses the qualities required for publication in the form of an article or a book, the editing process must begin. In general, understanding a verbatim transcription of an interview is often not straightforward and requires editing so that it may be transformed into a fluent, well-documented text that is easy to comprehend.100 Questions/8
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.The Role of Objects in Oral Narrative
Philosophers refer to anything that exists—or possesses the potential to exist—as an object. This concept may manifest in material forms, abstract notions, and even human emotions and lived experiences. In other words, an object encompasses a vast spectrum of beings and phenomena, each endowed with particular attributes and characteristics, and apprehensible in diverse modalities.