Oral History Interview & Importance – Part 23

Arguments with the Narrator

Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian

2017-9-26


One thing that the interviewer shall seriously avoid is long discussions and argument with the narrator. In some cases the narrator insists on the credibility of their information and perceptions and the interviewer has a different idea based on their sources of information. In such cases, both sides might insist on their position and interrupt the interview.

The following has to be stated:

  1. The main task of the interviewer is to jog the mind of the narrator to help them remember old memories and incidents they have witnessed; however such efforts shall not be imperious and controlling. Unfortunately we see interviewers that due to their knowledge and long experience have a top to bottom look and in case of any mistakes by the narrator brag about their information and humiliate the narrator to prove their perceptions.
  2. Mistakes in recounting the memories is an inevitable element in the oral history interviewer and requires patience. Nevertheless, time and number of incidents weaken the memory and information gets mixed up and result in faults by the narrator while recounting them and they might not acknowledge their mistake. Under such circumstances, the interviewer shall respectfully and with no long arguments point out the mistake and in case the narrator refuses to accept, the interviewer shall stop the argument and wait for an opportunity to provide enough evidence to prove his argument. In case it doesn’t work, a full description shall be provided as footnote by the narrator while publishing the article.

I remember that while interviewing a prominent social and cultural feature, he made a mistake. I pointed it out to be corrected but he didn’t accept it. Hence, I didn’t argue and in our next sessions tried to provide evidence and literature to prove it. Despite all the evidence he insisted on his position. In such cases there is nothing but patience and flexibility and definitions and elaborations shall be offered as annexes to the publications.

 

  1. Sometimes the narrator requires the interviewer to express their opinion on the subject matter or their idea of the memories recounted. Such cases are not an opportunity for arguments and challenges. Our opinion might differ but there is no need to start a long discussion and argument.
  2. The biggest mistake is to boast others’ opinion and create fronts in between. Such behaviors cripple the narrator’s self-confidence and in some cases it might be associated with a bad reaction by the narrator. Of course in a targeted interview, while asking questions, it is possible to make reference to other narrations but it shall not be in the form of arguments and quarrel.

 

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 1 - Oral History, Path to Cultural Dialogue

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 2 - Characteristics of an Interviewer

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 3 - Selecting a Subject

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 4 - Narrator Identification & Selection

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 5 - Goal Setting

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 6 - Importance of Pre-interview Data Collection

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 7 - To Schedule & Coordinate an Interview

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 8 - Required Equipment & Accessories

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 9 - Presentation is vital

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 10 - Interview Room

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 11 - Pre-interview Justifications

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 12 - How to Start an Interview

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 13 - Proper Query

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 14 - Sample Query

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 15 - How to ask questions?

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 16 - Body Languag

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 17 - Application of Body Language (1)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 18 - Application of Body Language (2)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 19 - Listening Carefully (1)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 20 - Listening Carefully (2)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 21- New Questions

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 22 - Duration



 
Number of Visits: 5369


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 

Morteza Tavakoli Narrates Student Activities

I am from Isfahan, born in 1336 (1957). I entered Mashhad University with a bag of fiery feelings and a desire for rights and freedom. Less than three months into the academic year, I was arrested in Azar 1355 (November 1976), or perhaps in 1354 (1975). I was detained for about 35 days. The reason for my arrest was that we gathered like-minded students in the Faculty of Literature on 16th of Azar ...

A narration from the event of 17th of Shahrivar

Early on the morning of Friday, 17th of Shahrivar 1357 (September 17, 1978), I found myself in an area I was familiar with, unaware of the gathering that would form there and the intense reaction it would provoke. I had anticipated a march similar to previous days, so I ventured onto the street with a tape recorder I had brought back from my recent trip abroad.
Baqubah Camp: Life among Nameless Prisoners

A Review of the Book “Brothers of the Castle of the Forgetful”: Memoirs of Taher Asadollahi

"In the morning, a white-haired, thin captain who looked to be twenty-five or six years old came after counting and having breakfast, walked in front of everyone, holding his waist, and said, "From tomorrow on, when you sit down and get up, you will say, 'Death to Khomeini,' otherwise I will bring disaster upon you, so that you will wish for death."

Tabas Fog

Ebham-e Tabas: Ramzgoshayi az ja’beh siah-e tahajom nezami Amrika (Tabas Fog: Decoding the Black Box of the U.S. Military Invasion) is the title of a recently published book by Shadab Asgari. After the Islamic Revolution, on November 4, 1979, students seized the US embassy in Tehran and a number of US diplomats were imprisoned. The US army carried out “Tabas Operation” or “Eagle’s Claw” in Iran on April 24, 1980, ostensibly to free these diplomats, but it failed.