Oral History Interview & Importance Part 11
Pre-interview Justifications
Hamid Qazvini
Natalie Haghverdian
2017-6-28
It was stated in the previous notes that both parties to the interview should have sufficient knowledge about one another and a proper understanding of the interview subject. The interview shall not start unless there is sufficient knowledge and recognition. It is for this very reason that the project goals and subject and question limits shall be defined and proper agreement reached with the narrator prior to the interview. In fact, it is the duty of the interviewer to resolve any probable concern of the narrator which might affect the interview and its quality. There are many people with legal, political, security, social and cultural concerns or constraints for which the issue shall be recognized and resolved prior to the interview to prevent any complications. Most importantly the narrator should be properly informed if the project is supported by a research institution or publication or is just a personal project.
On the other hand, the narrator shall not suffer divergence on the subject. In some cases, despite direct observations and having information, problems occurring in the time of the event or afterwards the narrator suffers divergence and change of attitude on the subject and is not ready for a precise and realistic interview. Accordingly, the narrator shall not be pressured and until he/she is properly justified on the subject, interview shall be avoided.
Another issues which require justification are the questions and the relevant answers. The narrator shall know how the questions will be asked and how he/she is to answer them. You should ask him/her to recount technical issues in a simple and understandable language. Also, the narrator shall offer a general and summarized recount or suffice to yes or no answers or body language which does not fulfill the intended target. The narrator shall be justified prior to the interview on how he/she is expected to answer the questions. The narrator might suffer audio and visual or speech limitations. Proper measures shall be taken accordingly on the method of the interview and there has to be a mutual agreement between the parties.
The narrator might have his/her own justification which has to be heard and recorded carefully to observe all possible recommendations on the interview method. The narrator shall be supported to transparently share his/her interviews. For instance, there might be limits in the subject and questions and answers implied by the narrator or he/she might have concerns on the publication methods. The narrator shall be informed that the interview is not private and a friendly gap and his/her words will be published eventually. Hence the narrator shall be informed on the publication media and probable formats. Obviously the narrator shall be informed on the archive methods and audio visual recordings and be assured of safekeeping by the scholar and colleagues.
The most important points to be taken into account in describing the project and providing justification to the narrator are his/her social status and characteristics and one unique method shall not be applied in all interviews. Sometimes, justifications surpass the mentality of the narrator or lead into misunderstanding. The narrator shall be encouraged on the subject to feel that his/her memories are valuable which have a crucial role in provision of the history.
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 1 - Oral History, Path to Cultural Dialogue
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 2 - Characteristics of an Interviewer
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 3 - Selecting a Subject
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 4 - Narrator Identification & Selection
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 5 - Goal Setting
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 6 - Importance of Pre-interview Data Collection
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 7 - To Schedule & Coordinate an Interview
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 8 - Required Equipment & Accessories
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 9 - Presentation is vital
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 10 - Interview Room
Number of Visits: 6478
The latest
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- 100 Questions/ 33
- Expert Panel Session on Oral History of the Country – (Part 2)
- Memoirs of Ahmad Nabavi
Most visited
- Oral History News/April–May 2026
- Memoirs of Majid Yousefzadeh
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 33
- Expert Panel Session on Oral History of the Country – (Part 2)
- 100 Questions/ 33
- Memoirs of Ahmad Nabavi
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.100 Questions/27
What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
