Book on Iran-U.S. relationship reprinted
The second edition of the book “Iran and America; past failure and reconciliation path” by Seyyed Hossein Mousavian was republished.
2015-12-21
According to IBNA correspondent, the book ‘Iran and America; past failure and reconciliation path’ is republished by Tisa publications.
The book consists of eight chapters with the following topics; ‘The relationship between Iran and America, from friendship to enmity’, ‘Hostage crisis, distrust and misunderstanding’, ‘Decade of war and stabilizing the revolution 1980 – 1989’, ‘A pragmatic president’, ‘The rise of the reform movement in Iran (1997 – 2005)’, ‘Ending sixteen years of mediocrity’, ‘Two views about the main conflicts’ and ‘The roadmap to peace’.
Mousavian, the author of the book, was the Ambassador of Iran to Germany, Head of the Foreign Relations Committee of Supreme National Security Council and a member of the nuclear negotiating team, and was once a candidate for the Deputy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (in the reformist government) and for the Minister of Foreign Affairs (at Ahmadinejad’s administration).
As the name suggests, the book is written around the central idea that the relations between Iran and America is full of mistakes, but learning from the past mistakes can help solve the problems.
Mousavian’s presence in the United States, as written in the preface of the book by Thomas Pickering, is an opportunity for America to become familiar with the views of Iran on different issues, as well as an opportunity for Iran to be able to clearly express its views.
The second edition of the book ‘Iran and America; past failure and reconciliation path’ by Seyyed Hossein Mousavian is published in 500 pages with a circulation of a thousand copies, at 290.000 Rls by Tisa publications. The book is offered with 10% discount to buyers.
Number of Visits: 5699
The latest
- Narrative and the "War of Narratives" in the Era of Resistance and Imposed Wars
- Memories of Mohammad Boloori
- Call for Fundamental Questions in the Field of Oral History
- 100 Questions/49
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 49
- Jasem Ghazbanpour's narration of the first day of the war in Khorramshahr
- Memoirs of Ali Fadaei
- The Relationship Between Oral History and Biography
Most visited
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 48
- 100 Questions/48
- The Relationship Between Oral History and Biography
- Jasem Ghazbanpour's narration of the first day of the war in Khorramshahr
- Memoirs of Ali Fadaei
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 49
- 100 Questions/49
- Memories of Mohammad Boloori
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.






