The Imposed War Oral History
New Horizons or Multiple Narratives?
Mohammad Doroodian
Translated by: Mohammad Karimi
2015-10-18
The expanding trend in using Oral History, bring about this question: What kind of goals and conclusions does Oral History observe? This question is based on two presumptions: First, using Oral History is followed for completing written history with a cultural-social approach. Moreover, the outcome of imposed war oral history would develop people’s defense approach toward war based on cultural-ideological teachings, and also multiple narratives of war events by the cooperation of all the people who have experienced war.
My goal for presenting this question and its survey is to clarify the pathology of imposed war Oral History and the “necessity” of revising it. As it is clear, the Imposed War Oral History, despite being methodologically “Oral”, however, its approach remains “historical”. With only a clear difference that in Oral History the individual’s relation with the event is narrative. So, political and social factors, individual-organizational motives of narrating an event, just like written historiography, play a very important role. By changing the conditions, the orientation and the subjects of the Imposed War Oral History, just like written historiography will change.
By this explanation and by assuming historical approach toward war, despite having the possibility of recognizing the details of political-military events of war, in time and place, does not have the capability of recognizing the “war problem”, conceptually and methodologically speaking, Oral History has the same vulnerabilities that written historiography has. Moreover, and despite the assumed original aims for Oral History, the resent methods in Oral History for completing written historiography will end in multiple narratives and it will gradually make it difficult to have a historical clarification by using a narrative that is comprehensive and accepted by all.
In written historiography, comparing other subjects, we focus on “events” considering the deeds of Army and Revolutionary Guards during the war, along with some other explanations. Oral History in its best form will present and explain the relation between the individual and the event. Actually, this matter will result in multiple narratives and completing the written history. This consideration is under the effect of Oral History characteristics, and also political –social conditions and individual-organization motives in narrating war.
Despite the original assumed goals for Oral History and considering the possible outcomes, is this outcome an expected and wanted one? Or there should be a revision in present aims and methods of the Imposed War Oral History?
In fact, “individualism” of the Imposed War Oral History, beside “military institutionalism” for reinforcing organizational identity, with the focus on “events” instead of strategic analysis, none would complete each other. However, by creating multiple narratives, understanding war events and subject will become more and more difficult for the war and after-war generations than ever.
Now; assuming the correctness of this pathology of the Imposed War Oral History, what should be done?
October 3rd, 2015
Number of Visits: 5518
The latest
- Obstacles, Limitations, and New Horizons
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 11
- 100 Questions/10
- The 23rd Commemoration Ceremony of the Martyrs of the Ansar al-Rasul Battalion Held
- A Narrative of Pakistani Pedestrian Pilgrims of Arbaeen in Sistan and Baluchestan
- Oral History Methodology/National Archives and Library Organization of Iran, Archives Research Institute
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 10
- 100 Questions/9
Most visited
- Oral History News – Aban 1404
- Oral History Methodology/National Archives and Library Organization of Iran, Archives Research Institute
- 100 Questions/9
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 10
- A Narrative of Pakistani Pedestrian Pilgrims of Arbaeen in Sistan and Baluchestan
- The 23rd Commemoration Ceremony of the Martyrs of the Ansar al-Rasul Battalion Held
- 100 Questions/10
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 11
100 Questions/6
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.The Importance of Pre-Publication Critique of Oral History Works
According to the Oral History website, a meeting for critique and review of the book “Oral History: Essence and Method” was held on Monday morning, November 10, 2025, with the attendance of the book’s author, Hamid Qazvini, and the critics Mohammad Qasemipour and Yahya Niazi, at the Ghasr-e Shirin Hall of the National Museum of the Islamic Revolution and Sacred Defense.Challenges of Interviewing in Oral History
After years of studying the theoretical foundations of oral history, conducting numerous interviews and going through their post-interview stages, as well as reading the available body of oral history literature, I was eventually given the opportunity to evaluate the edited versions of dozens of oral history projects.Comparing the Narratives of Commanders and Ordinary Combatants in the Sacred Defense
An Analysis of Functions and ConsequencesThe experience of the Sacred Defense cannot be comprehended merely through statistics or official reports; what truly endures from war are the narratives of those who stood upon its frontlines. These narratives, however, vary significantly depending on one’s position, responsibilities, and lived experience.
