Yale acquires oral history of choral conductor Sir David Willcocks
29 January 2012
January 25, 2012
Sterling Memorial Library has acquired a substantial collection of interviews on the prominent choral conductor and composer, Sir David Willcocks. Perhaps best known as the director of music at King’s College, Cambridge University, Willcocks also held the directorship of London’s Royal College of Music, and published the popular anthologies “Carols for Choirs.”
The David Willcocks Oral History collection includes several interviews with Willcocks, as well as those with family and colleagues such as vocalist Dame Janet Baker, conductors Neville Marriner and Simon Carrington, and composer John Rutter. A complete list of interviews in the Willcocks collection is available at the library’s Oral History of American Music (OHAM) website.
The collection furthers OHAM’s objective to preserve the recorded recollections of living individuals who either made history or witnessed it. The material will be open, by permission, to scholars and students, and will be a major resource for research on 20th-century choral music. Oxford University Press recently published a book based on the interviews, “A Life in Music: Conversations with Sir David Willcocks and Friends,” edited by William Owen.
William Owen organized this oral history project and conducted all the interviews. Owen received a Master of Music degree from Yale, where he began his work in oral history.
OHAM is the preeminent organization dedicated to the collection and preservation of recorded memoirs of contemporary musicians. Since its founding in the 1960s, OHAM has worked to preserve the sound of artists’ voices and make this primary source material available to the public. At OHAM, thousands of recordings and transcripts are accessible to a wide range of users including scholars, musicians, students, arts organizations, and the media.
See the OHAM website for more information.
Number of Visits: 5259
The latest
- The Relationship Between Oral History and Biography
- 100 Questions/48
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 48
- Seventh Theory: The evolutionary duality of document and narrative
- Memories of Davoud Molaei
- Preparing a report for Khorasan Radio and Television
- 100 Questions/47
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
Most visited
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
- Preparing a report for Khorasan Radio and Television
- 100 Questions/47
- Memories of Davoud Molaei
- Seventh Theory: The evolutionary duality of document and narrative
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.






