The Nurturing of Iranian Adolescents and Youth in Najaf

Translated by Kianoush Borzouei

2025-1-28


In Najaf, from the very first years, based on my prior experience in Iran after the establishment of the Razavi National Primary School and the Center for Religious Discussion and Critique, I felt a deep sense of responsibility and compassion for the youth and adolescents. Concerned about their future, I attempted to guide them onto the right path to the extent of my abilities. This concern also preoccupied me in Najaf, and I sought to take actionable steps toward achieving this goal, although I knew it required the assistance of others.

At the time, Ayatollah Shahroudi had established a national primary school, and a number of the children of Iranian, Afghan, and Pakistani seminarians, along with other Persian-speaking individuals, were enrolled there. On the other hand, there was also an Iranian government-run school, funded by the Iranian state, where some of the teachers were affiliated with SAVAK.

I was determined to work with these children, yet I had no direct access to them. There were only one or two trusted individuals I could rely upon. One of them was Mr. Hassan Zadeh Kashmiri, who taught at Ayatollah Shahroudis school. I spoke with him, urging him to begin engaging with the students and guiding them in the desired direction. He agreed and began his efforts. However, after just one or two sessions, he came to me in great distress, saying, The situation is frightful; the students want to beat me up.”

I asked, What happened? What did you do?” He replied, I made some remarks against the Shah.” I said, This wasnt the right time for such comments.” He asked, What should I do now?” I told him, Before things escalate further, go to their homes, speak to them, and diffuse the situation by admitting that you misspoke.”

From then on, I guided him step by step on what needed to be done. He regularly reported back to me, and I continued advising him to the best of my ability. Over time, Mr. Sheikh Hossein-Ali Ansari Najafabadi also began engaging with the youth, leveraging the involvement of a young boy, and he too became actively involved. I suggested holding sessions for the youth, where I started teaching them Arabic literature and Jame-ul-Muqaddamat. Gradually, the number of participating students grew, with some even bringing along their friends.

Mr. Ansari began working with the students at a small school named Qadiri. Over time, the very same students who, as Mr. Hassan Zadeh initially lamented, had been resistant, questioning, What do you expect of us? Our flesh, blood, and bones have been nurtured with the Shahs money,” had undergone a remarkable transformation. Eventually, they started asking how they could actively oppose the Shahs regime. After some time, these youths would sneak into the Iranian school at night to destroy portraits of the Shah and his wife, replacing them with slogans like Death to the Shah” on the walls. The following day, they would attend classes in the same school.

Some of the SAVAK-affiliated teachers there were aggressively trying to identify the culprits. One of these teachers even confronted the students directly, but when he faced threats from them, he dared not pursue the matter further. In this manner, these youths became part of the revolutionary movement in Najaf, conducting numerous revolutionary activities, all of which, I believe, were blessings inspired by Imam Khomeini.[1]

 


[1] Source: Memoirs of the Najaf Years, Vol. 2, Tehran: Arouj Publishing, 1st Edition, 1389 [2010], pp. 38–39.



 
Number of Visits: 2272


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (3 + 2) :
 
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions / 43

How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents

The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of Documents
More than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions / 42

What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.