Oral History Workshop – 8
Rules of an interview
Shahed Yazdan
Translated by M. B. Khoshnevisan
2023-1-24
The oral history website is going to provide the educational materials of some oral history workshops to the audience in written form. The present series has been prepared using the materials of one of these workshops. As you will see, many of the provided contents are not original or less said contents, but we have tried to provide categorized contents so that they can be used more.
***
During the interview
The interviewer needs to observe the social rues during the interview. In this section, some of these rules are described.
Rules of an interview
● If the duration of each interview session is between 60 and 90 minutes, it is a good option and will give the best result.
● The place of the interview should be a place where the interviewee chooses and he or she feels more comfortable.
● The interviewer's body language is of great importance; Where to show states such as confirmation, surprise, etc. to the interviewee with different body postures or speak with hand gestures. There is no single version for this issue; the interviewer must determine the best way to use body language during the interview according to the culture, location, etc.
● The interval between two sessions depends on the researcher's discretion and does not include any rules, but some experts suggest that one interview session should be held every week.
● The meeting should have a "good start"; The interviewer should find this good start according to the mood of the interviewee.
● Before conducting an interview, the interviewer needs to review and remember the questions he or she has prepared for each meeting repeatedly; also, he or she should be prepared to ask the questions that may arise during the interview. Questions should not be asked in full in the interview session. Only the interviewer can write down some words in the notebook so that he or she does not forget.
● How the interviewer sits is also very important. Creating a balance between sitting too formally or too comfortably, as well as the position and angle of the interviewer in relation to the interviewee are things like this.
● Gaining the narrator's trust by the interviewer is very important. If the interviewee is sure about what he or she says or what he or she sees in the interview place, the interviewer is a trustworthy person.
● In some countries, to do an oral history work, a written legal contract is drawn up, and the interview starts after signing this contract. In this contract, things like identifying the owner of the work, permission to use and publish, violation of laws, etc. are seen.
● Every interview must have an identity certificate. For this purpose, at the beginning and end of the meeting, the interviewer speaks in one or two sentences about the name of the interviewee, the interview date, the location of the meeting, the number of meetings and its topic.
Number of Visits: 3750
The latest
- The Underground City of Tehran
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -2
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor - 36
- Third Theory: Covering up the gaps in the document with oral narration
- 100 Questions/35
- Javad Poyanfar's Memories
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -1
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
Most visited
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Rahim Afshar's Memories
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -1
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 35
- Javad Poyanfar's Memories
- Third Theory: Covering up the gaps in the document with oral narration
- 100 Questions/35
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor - 36
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.100 Questions/27
What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
